102

News

New climate policy mechanisms a boon to Denmark’s CO2 reduction plans

Stephen Gadd
October 19th, 2017


This article is more than 7 years old.

By signing the Paris Agreement on climate change, the European Union pledged to do its bit in reducing CO2 emissions

It’s all about transferring CO2 quotas from one sector to another (photo: Michael Hoffmann Hansen)

As part of an EU-wide initiative, Denmark has committed to a 39 percent reduction in CO2 emissions by 2030 in sectors not covered by the emissions trading system (ETS).

READ ALSO: Massive investment in CO2 reduction partnership projects

Last weekend, the EU’s climate ministers reached an agreement on how an overall reduction should be shared out amongst the member states, reports Ingeniøren.

A two-pronged attack
The deal allows for two flexible mechanisms: one on reducing emissions in sectors not covered by ETS, the other on emissions from land use and forestry.

The first proposal foresees emissions cuts in non-ETS sectors – including buildings, transport, waste and agriculture from 2021-2030 – through binding annual targets for all members states. These sectors together account for more than half of all EU emissions.

The second proposal – on land use, land use change and forestry (LULUCF) – is about incorporating emissions and removals from land use and forests into the EU’s climate framework from 2021. It will enshrine the ‘no-debit’ rule – ensuring no net emissions from LULUCF activities – in EU law.

Good news for Danish farmers
For Denmark, the combination of LULUCF and ETS credits could provide around 80 percent of the CO2 reduction needed in the transport, buildings and farming sectors for the period 2021-2030.

Access to these mechanisms varies from country to country. The greatest degree of flexibility is reserved for countries highly dependent on farming that would be especially hard hit by steep reductions. So countries such as Ireland, Denmark, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania are allowed to transfer the largest amounts of CO2 using this system.

The energy and climate minister, Lars Christian Lilleholt, intends to used these new mechanisms and is pleased with the agreement.

“We’ve managed to cut a deal that is also good for Denmark,” he said.

“What we have to accomplish by 2030, we can manage without affecting growth and prosperity in Denmark and Danish jobs.”

The art of the possible
According to estimates from Energistyrelsen, a 39 percent reduction would mean that Denmark has to reduce CO2 emissions by around 28 million tonnes from 2021 to 2030 in the transport, buildings and farming sectors. Of this, the ETS mechanism can contribute around 8 million tonnes and LULUCF 14.6 million tonnes.

The climate agreement now has to be formally ratified by the European Parliament, but it is not expected to be amended significantly.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”