336

News

Dong Energy changes its name to Ørsted

Christian Wenande
October 2nd, 2017


This article is more than 7 years old.

Sustainable branding does not include name links to its dirty past

And they played around with the Ø … presumably Mø is next in line with a lawsuit (photo: Ørsted)

The days of people visiting Denmark and having a right chuckle about the name of the Danish energy company Dong Energy are coming to an end. The reason, however, is no joke.

In a bid to shed the fossil-fuelled skin of its past, Dong Energy announced this morning that it would change its name to Ørsted – a name taken from the Danish scientist Hans Christian Ørsted (1777-1851), who was the brain behind a number of scientific discoveries, including the discovery of electromagnetism in 1820.

“DONG was originally short for Danish Oil and Natural Gas. With our profound strategic transformation and the divestment of our upstream oil and gas business, this is no longer who we are. Therefore, now is the right time to change our name,” said Thomas Thune Andersen, the company’s chairman.

“Our vision is a world that runs entirely on green energy. Climate change is one of the most serious challenges facing the world today, and to avoid causing serious harm to the global ecosystems, we need to fundamentally change the way we power the world by switching from black to green energy.”

READ MORE: DONG Energy sells off oil and gas assets

Divesting fossil fuels
The energy giant has taken great strides to embrace a more sustainable future recently, underlined by its decision earlier this year to divest its oil and gas assets for 8.7 billion kroner to the British chemical firm Ineos.

The company’s name transition will naturally include a new logo, as well as a new brand identity that is “simple, functional and supportive of a sustainable way of life”.

“2017 will be remembered as the year when offshore wind became cheaper than black energy, as demonstrated by the recent tenders for offshore wind in Germany and the UK,” said Ørsted chief executive Henrik Poulsen.

“It has never been more clear that it is possible to create a world that runs entirely on green energy. The time is now right for us to change our name to demonstrate we want to help create such a world.”

See more about the name change in the video below.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”