85

News

More competition could yield big savings for municipalities, DI survey suggests

Stephen Gadd
August 29th, 2017


This article is more than 7 years old.

As well as the financial reward, there is also a potential green dividend to be had

A green project in Odense saves money as well as being good for the environment (photo: Torben Jarlstrøm Clausen)

According to a recent survey carried out by the confederation of Danish industry, Dansk Industri (DI), municipalities could be 4.8 billion kroner better off if all of them were as good as the best ones when it comes to tendering out services.

The survey investigated how many of their services the 98 municipalities in Denmark offered for private tender.

READ ALSO: Productivity commission urges more privatisation

Experience from Odense shows that more competition can also benefit the environment and increase social responsibility.

More bang for their buck
“The municipalities simply get more for their money. That gives them greater freedom to improve the quality of the services they offer,” said DI’s deputy director general, Tine Roed.

“A number of municipalities have already realised that it is possible both to make things run more efficiently and get better quality by allowing private companies to bid for their services. It’s now a matter of getting the others to follow suit.”

According to the survey, last year the best municipalities tendered 40.9 percent of their services privately, whilst the average was 26.9 percent, so there is apparently considerable untapped potential.

A green dividend
Odense has entered into an agreement with De Forenede Dampvaskerier, a laundry company responsible for washing and repairing working-clothes for 2,200 employees in the municipality’s health and handicapped sector.

As well as saving the municipality 9 million kroner, the discarded clothes are also used to produce environmentally-friendly reusable tote bags.

Brian Skov Nielsen from the municipality is extremely pleased with the project. “We’ve saved money, reduced the impact on the environment and created work for people in flex jobs and sheltered occupations – all by thinking innovatively about how we can tender the municipality’s services.”

Tine Roed would like to see Parliament set a goal of having 45 percent of all the services that lend themselves to privatisation tendered out by 2025.

“Setting a goal like this will help to accelerate developments so that more municipalities could benefit from exposure to competition.”


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”