1113

News

Book Review of ‘What’s so Special about the Danes’

Ben Hamilton
August 23rd, 2017


This article is more than 7 years old.

★★★★

It’s a recommended read providing you’re well accustomed to Denmark

Stephanie Madsen’s ‘What’s so Special about the Danes’ is an antithesis to the legion of books released in recent years that attempt to explain how various Danish elements – such as hygge, happiness, television shows like Borgen and Forbryldsen, and New Nordic cuisine – have made such a big impression worldwide.

A Brit-free zone
Central to this explosion in the popularity of Faroese knitwear have been the British Danophiles – the Guardian-reading viewers of BBC 4 who the likes of journalists Michael Booth (The Almost Nearly Perfect People) and Helen Russell (The Year of Living Danishly) have been quick to capitalise on.

In contrast, Madsen’s book couldn’t be more non-journalistic, and she hasn’t interviewed or consulted a single Brit. Instead, most of the interviews are with people from France – she was born in Paris and raised in Haiti – Denmark and the US, the two countries she has primarily lived in as an adult.

Forthright opinions
The absence of whinging, faintly funny Brits might be welcome news to many, as is the book’s brevity, easy-to-read nature and overall plain talking. Madsen doesn’t hold back or gingerly speculate like she’s afraid the Danish people will launch a collective lawsuit.

She offers forthright opinions on why the Danish are the way they are, and within her well-thought out theories are insights that many international residents will appreciate, although they might be less accessible to new arrivals or non-residents who often need to be spoon-fed the basics.

So while this book’s haphazard narrative might bewilder the recent wave of journalistic books championed by the likes of Jon Ronson – many will enjoy it, because didn’t you know: the people have had enough of experts!

Not one for the purists
From a journalistic perspective, there are plenty of flaws, particularly with the interviews, which are mostly a random procession of expats and repats repeating old hat, with the occasional nugget hidden here and there.

Most of them read like they’ve been transcribed by a sixth-grader. If the intention was a Godfather-style staccato prose (“I believe in America. America has made my fortune” etc), it starts to grate pretty quickly.

Others are long chunks of text that were most probably written in an email to Madsen, which she just copied and pasted and then crossed off another two pages of her book.

There’s a good interview of Martin Lidegaard, a former foreign minister, but a risible one of Bertel Haarder, one of Denmark’s most distinguished politicians, which pretty much ends before it gets started, suggesting he gave her short shrift when she asked him about a priest who doesn’t believe in God.

Its inclusion is pointless. The only reasonably explanation is that he’s a big name, and Madsen  hopes the readers won’t notice he only said two words and that they both began with ‘N’.

Another criticism would be that at times it’s hard to know whose opinion is being presented: Madsen’s or the subject’s.

Educational, enlightening, easygoing
Nevertheless, the book is an easy read. Despite Madsen not being a native English speaker, there are no language issues: it’s well edited and the sentences are never overly long. Madsen’s chosen to play it safe and not be too ambitious with her prose, and accordingly there’s very little wit.

Aside from a few misrepresentations (including a claim that Denmark is number one for the consumption of happy pills – not true we’re afraid), it’s generally well researched.

Most appreciated were the insights regarding Denmark’s Protestant roots, small size and identity, climate and employment record. They alone were worth the effort of what amounted to only two to three hours of reading.

I would have personally preferred to read more about the authority-challenging year of 1968 and its effects on Danish education and society over the next decade than lengthy concerns expressed about gender equality on company boards – a passion project, it would appear. A few more insights about what the future might hold in store for Denmark wouldn’t have gone amiss either.

Overall I felt educated, enlightened and at ease reading this book and would recommend this to ‘lifers’ interested in some intelligent observation about the nation whose country they call home.

Purchase a copy here.

 


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”