110

News

Privatisation of TV2 would be harmful to media, warns Socialdemokrakiet

Ben Hamilton
August 14th, 2017


This article is more than 7 years old.

Danish values of democracy and diversity at stake, claims party leader Mette Frederiksen

Throw in a barbie and maybe Murdoch will be interested (photo: Leif Jørgensen)

TV2 is a peculiar channel. Although it’s commercial – it runs adverts and subscribers have paid a small fee to view it since January 2012 – it is still publicly owned and receives state support, primarily for its local news output, which is far more wide-reaching than state broadcaster DR.

And as a member of the European Broadcasting Union – only one of two commercial channel members across the entire continent – it can still pick up the rights to major sports events such as the European Championship football tournament at a heavily discounted price.

Of the 4.4 billion kroner the state spends every year on its public service, DR get around 3.6 billion and TV2 0.5 billion.

Privatisation looming for TV2
But now all that might change, as the government parties are believed to be in favour of completely privatising it under the terms of the next media deal, for which negotiations are due to start soon.

Socialdemokrakiet head Mette Frederiksen is opposed to the idea because she fears the channel could end up in foreign ownership, and that this could lead to a slippery slope of fake news and pursuing the lowest common denominator.

Democracy and diversity at stake
“When we look around the world, even in western democracies, the media can often play a different tune to the one we are used to in our open democracy,” she told Metroxpress.

“You could end up with a foreign buyer who neither wants democracy nor diversity.”

Frederiksen is concerned that most of the debate has so far concerned DR – namely reducing its funding or even scrapping the licence fee altogether – and that this could distract attention away from TV2, which is, after all, “Denmark’s favourite TV channel”.

READ MORE: Danish state broadcaster increasingly coming under financial pressure

 

 

 

 

 


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”