101

News

Smoke-free beach proposal unpopular with politicians but strikes a chord with public

Ben Hamilton
August 2nd, 2017


This article is more than 7 years old.

MP questions whether it is a good use of police resources, while cancer group suggests beach-goers must enforce a ban themselves

No more buttresses in sand castles (photo: publicdomainpictures.net)

Cancer concern group Kræftens Bekæmpelse (KB) has applauded a proposal to make Danish beaches smoke-free zones. However, it is doubtful whether there is the necessary political will to enforce a ban.

France’s example
Following in the footsteps of the EU and several European countries – such as France, where the number of smoke-free beaches has risen from none to 53 in the last five years – Niels Them Kjær, a KB project manager, believes the proposal will lead to cleaner and more social beaches.

While Professor Morten Grønbæk, a board member at health body Institut for Folkesundhed, suggests fewer children will witness role models smoking in what is a fun environment – a little like the exposure granted by movies.

A good use of police resources?
Venstre’s health spokesperson, Jane Heitmann, questions whether enforcing it – in France, for example, those caught smoking are fined just 125 kroner – will be a good use of police resources. Socialdemokratiet is also opposed to a ban.

In response Kjær told DR the ban would need to be enforced by the beach-goers themselves. “We also have nobody enforcing the areas in which it is advised you’ll be skating on thin ice,” he said.

No to smoking in nature
And a series of DR interviews with a cross-section of beach-goers at Julebæk Strand in Helsingør would appear to have unearthed enough vigilantes to enforce the ban.

The public, increasingly it would appear, object to people smoking in Danish nature.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”