67

News

Unlikely but not unthinkable: Success on a shoestring in the Superliga

Ben Hamilton
July 20th, 2017


This article is more than 7 years old.

Can the top flight new boys Helsingør with its meagre budget emulate Herfølge’s heroics of 2000

The average Danish Superliga club had staff costs five times more than the average First Division outfit, according to an analysis of the 2015-16 accounts of 23 of the divisions’ sides by Idrættens Analyseinstitut ahead of the start of the new season last weekend.

Superliga champions FC Copenhagen led the way with staff costs of 156.9 million kroner – almost 100 million clear of the average 63.8 million paid out in the 12-team top flight, which increased in size to include 14 sides from the summer of 2016.

The average in the First Division was 13.1 million, with recently promoted Helsingør only paying 3.5 million. FC Vestsjælland did not contribute to the report as it went bankrupt midway through the season.

Better in the black
Overall, Idrættens Analyseinstitut concluded that Sønderjyske was the club most punching above its weight, as it managed to finish second in the Superliga on a comparatively modest budget.

Sønderjyske’s revenue soared by 20 percent to 53.9 million thanks to a huge growth in its TV revenue from 15.6 to 27.3 million and a 50 percent jump in attendances. Overall, it made a 2.7 million kroner profit.

Also in the black were FCK’s parent company Parken Sport & Entertainment (66.5 profit), FC Nordsjælland (24.0), AaB (7.1), Randers (1.3) and AC Horsens (0.5). Bringing up the rear were Brøndby with a loss of 31.9 million.

A clear correlation
“There is a very clear correlation between how much you spend on pay and how much you win. The clubs that can maintain high levels of pay compared to the other clubs win more trophies,” Rasmus Storm, the chief analyst at Idrættens Analyseinstitut, explained to DR.

However, some clubs like Helsingør and Herfølge – which won the Superliga title in 2000 despite having the lowest wage bill – can get lucky, contends Storm.

“If you have a particularly good strategy, organisation and playing staff, you can beat the odds,” he concluded.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”