201

News

DI: Denmark risks losing leading cleantech position

Christian Wenande
June 22nd, 2017


This article is more than 7 years old.

A number of countries look better prepared to tackle the industry in the future

It the sun rising or setting on Danish cleantech? (photo: Pixabay)

Danish companies are leading the charge when it comes to developing clean and sustainable solutions, products and services.

But according to the Danish confederation of industry, Dansk Industri (DI), and a report from the World Wildlife Foundation (WWF), Denmark’s trailblazing ways are under siege thanks to cuts in research and innovation.

The WWF, for instance, reported in its recent 2017 Global Cleantech Innovation index (here in English) that while Denmark was ranked first, the report was based on data from 2013-2016.

“The indicator data is from 2013 to 2016, which means the scores of countries may not be up to date. The index results and country profiles should therefore be interpreted as strengths and weaknesses in relation to other countries in the 2013-2016 period. For example, Denmark has since cut its cleantech R&D budget by half since measurements were taken for the 2017 Index,” WWF wrote.

READ MORE: Denmark best in the world at developing green energy tech

Future like the Finns
In fact, second-placed Finland looks to be in a far better position to engage in cleantech looking into the future – in terms of having better conditions for startups within cleantech. Sweden, France, Canada, the US and Israel also look better poised to meet future challenges facing the industry.

DI points to the 2016 budget law – which stripped 1.4 billion kroner from research and education – as being one of the more recent central detractors for cleantech in Denmark.

“The frameworks are essential to whether or not we will be surpassed – and right now they are far from good enough,” said Troels Ranis, an industry head with DI Energy.

“We invest far too little in research and innovation, and therefore too little in companies that in the future can generate growth and employment in Denmark. We need a clear strategy that conveys what it is we want to hedge our bets on and to support the development we want.”


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”