135

Opinion

Union Views: A matter of appearance
Union Views

June 3rd, 2017


This article is more than 7 years old.

But Mr Wolf asked for lots of cream, lots of sugar

Have you ever been caught in the wrong clothes at the wrong time? I don’t mean in shorts while skiing, but in a professional context.

I have, so these days, I do my best to avoid it. Not only is it awkward, but it also reduces your chances of making a good impression and, ultimately, making sales.

Pass the word to Mr Wolf
An example of a clothing faux pas that I made was, in a previous job. I went straight from a meeting with a client in the financial sector to a project kickoff with a very different customer, who needed to map and optimise their business processes.

There I was on an early Friday afternoon: slicked-back hair, dark suit and armed with a PowerPoint. The result = completely unsuccessful in getting a buy-in from the client’s staff.

The problem was that I did not signal “together we optimise the workflow, so you can spend more time on core activities.” I was more like Mr Wolf from ‘Pulp Fiction’ – called to solve a problem.

It may seem superficial, but my appearance made a difference. The kickoff, and especially the subsequent project, would have gone better had I dropped the jacket and tie and rolled up my shirtsleeves.

15 seconds and counting
Obviously, your professionalism counts. But you may never bring it into play. On average, first impressions are formed in 15 seconds − light years before you have had a chance to speak.

This is why you need to be aware of your appearance. And appearance is not about looking like a model; it’s about mirroring your environment.

Appearance is a prerequisite
Of course, appearance doesn’t cut it alone. A career requires more than ironed shirts and polished shoes. Or, as Alan Dundes says: “Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.”

Appearance is a prerequisite for being taken seriously and obtaining talk-time. That means it’s okay that looking the part is considered as important as your professional skills. It’s okay that you can be promoted or get kicked out if you do not master the art.

Or is it? What do you think

About

Union Views

Steen Vive is senior advisor at Djøf, the Danish Association of Lawyers and Economists. He is a blogger and manager of various projects aimed at generating jobs in the private sector. In this column he writes about trends and tendencies in the labour market. Follow him on Twitter @SteenVive


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”