122

News

Denmark’s new district heating initiative to close legal loophole

Stephen Gadd
June 2nd, 2017


This article is more than 7 years old.

A number of consumers tied to district heating agreements have been at risk of paying too much because companies have been interpreting existing rules creatively

Keeping warm and snug the green way may be cheaper in the future (photo: Bjoertvedt)

Parliament is reviewing a government bill that will mean municipalities will lose 100 percent of their block grants if they choose to withdraw capital that includes interest from their utility supply companies.

At the moment, district heating companies have been able to claim capital costs and interest on their original investment, as well as the costs of energy production and distribution.

READ ALSO: Higher heating costs to affect over 200,000 Danish households

“The broad majority behind this proposal invite district heating companies that have applied for interest on previously-invested capital under the current rules to withdraw their applications to protect consumers from unreasonable price increases,” said the climate and energy minister, Lars Christian Lilleholt.

Cheaper heating and more green growth
“I’m extremely glad we are able to reassure the approximately 1.7 million district heating customers around the country, who will be able to look forward to a cheaper and more effective supply,” added Lilleholt.

Dansk Folkeparti is also optimistic. Mikkel Dencker, the energy spokesperson for DF, said that “for us, it has been a top priority that it should no longer be possible to milk district heating customers. At the same time, we are ensuring there is still a possibility for investment and growth in this sector.”

District heating is seen as one of the cornerstones for future green growth. Ida Auken, the climate and energy spokesperson for Radikale, said that “it has been essential to our party that room has been created for investment in converting to green technology and new technologies, as well as an effectivisation of the sector.”

The agreement means there will be a ceiling placed on how much companies can charge consumers.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”