366

News

Denmark fails in WHO report regarding underage drinking

Christian Wenande
May 18th, 2017


This article is more than 7 years old.

Low age limit and easy access among the main detractors

Drinking: Danes start ’em young (photo: Pixabay)

When it comes to young people drinking alcohol in Europe, no nations can compare themselves with the Danes. Mostly, that’s due to a low age limit and the easy access to spirits, wine and beer.

READ MORE: New mobile app to combat underage smoking and drinking in Denmark

According to a new World Health Organization report that investigates alcohol culture in the EU, Denmark scored a measly six out of 100 when it comes to alcohol accessibility. Only Switzerland and Germany scored worse.

In a Nordic comparison, Sweden scored 77, Norway 70 and Finland 93. In all three countries, government-owned liquor stores are the only retail outlets permitted to sell alcoholic beverages that contain more than 3.5 percent alcohol by volume.

In Denmark, meanwhile, people can buy any kind of alcoholic beverage in shops and kiosks at all hours of the day.

“I find it quite alarming. We have known we have a relatively relaxed alcohol policy and we ranked high for accessibility, but it’s new to be rated so poorly as we are currently,” Pernille Bendtsen, the head of secretariat at the prevention council, Vidensråd for Forebyggelse, told DR Nyheder.

READ MORE: Danish government would allow minors to serve alcohol

No political will
Denmark’s low age limit also plays a huge role. Danes can buy moderate-strength alcoholic beverages such as beer at the age of 16, while it’s 18 in Norway, Sweden and Finland. Young people have to be 20 to buy strong alcoholic beverages, namely spirits/liquor, in all of the Nordic nations bar Denmark, where it’s just 18.

The WHO report also found that every third youngster aged 15-16 has been intoxicated within the last month – a clear European record and almost three times higher than the EU average.

Vidensråd for Forebyggelse has called upon the politicians to take action and raise the age limit for alcohol. However, there is currently limited political will in the halls of Christiansborg, where neither the Venstre or Socialdemokratiet parties are keen.

“Politically, we don’t want to introduce tougher regulations or more bans than necessary,” Flemming Møller Mortensen, the spokesperson for Socialdemokratiet regarding health issues, told DR Nyheder.

“We like it that people can be free to make some decisions on their own.”


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”