173

News

New study rubbishes Denmark’s large animal conservation efforts

Christian Wenande
May 15th, 2017


This article is more than 7 years old.

Denmark ranked 117th globally in terms of protecting the planet’s megafauna

Where’s your bio-diversity Denmark? (photo: Pixabay)

A new international research study has revealed that Denmark ranks poorly when it comes to protecting the world’s endangered animals.

Despite being the best performing nation in the world at allocating funds to conservation per GDP, Denmark was rated ‘below average’ by the index at conserving the planet’s megafauna (large animal species).

Denmark ranked 117th globally in terms of protecting the planet’s megafauna, faring badly compared to their Nordic brethren, coming in way behind Norway (6th), Sweden (16th) and Finland (20th). The findings are also on point, according to researchers.

“More protected areas are critical, not just for large animals, but for all of our biological diversity,” Jens-Christian Svenning, a professor at the Department of Bioscience at Aarhus University, told Videnskab.dk.

“A lack of space is absolutely the biggest problem for biological diversity in Denmark. Moreover, there is ample opportunity to get more megafauna back in several areas around the country, not just for the sake of the animals, but for their organic function in regards to getting a richer and more self-sustained nature.”

Over half of Denmark is taken up by arable land – well above the EU average of 17-35 percent.

READ MORE: Denmark has its first wolf pack

Morose Middle East
The top 10 on the list was dominated by African nations. Botswana was ranked first, followed by Namibia, Tanzania, Bhutan and Zimbabwe, while Norway, the Central African Republic, Canada, Zambia and Rwanda completed the best of the best.

In the bottom ten it was the Middle East that was the most visible. San Marino was rock bottom, followed by the UAE, Syria, Libya, Qatar, Yemen, Uruguay, Lichtenstein, Oman and Iraq.

The findings were recently published in the scientific journal Global Ecology and Conservation.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”