143

Things to do

Theatre Review: Turning heads and the talk of the town

Mark Walker
May 9th, 2017


This article is more than 7 years old.

★★★★★

The cast get a deserved ovation (photo: Hasse Ferrold)

“I just shot a man” exclaims Lesley, an actress whose desperate quest for approval is both grotesque and moving. Performed by Vanessa Poole, Lesley goes on to inform us that the weapon was a harpoon gun, and it is with this curious detail that we are launched into this unique production of Alan Bennet’s ‘Talking Heads’.

Affinity with the material
It’s a rare occasion that a series of monologues, served only by modest (but precisely arranged and coloured) staging, can evoke such a vivid series of images and a rich sense of period and personality. ‘Talking Heads’ was originally conceived in 1989, by playwright Alan Bennet, as a series of 13 episodes broadcast on BBC television over a nine-year period.

What’s striking is this cast’s obvious affinity with the material. Each of the three members give soulful, hilarious, full-blooded performances, perfectly embodying their roles, so as to disappear into them to delicious effect. And this is absolutely by design: in order to adapt the works for a 90-minute stage production, Italian director Annalisa Rossi challenged three British, Malmö-based actors from Playmate theatre to select a single character study from the original series – one that would play best to their individual strengths.

The result being that each role is performed with an immaculate ear for the text by all three players, lending a hyper-real emotionality that, like the heightened social realism of Mike Leigh’s best work, veers toward caricature but never mockery, nor does it fail to hit its mark.

Standout performance
Of particular note was Graham, as portrayed by Robin Gotti, a single, middle-aged man whose stagnation and loneliness is initially attributed to the demands of his overbearing, elderly mother. And yet, when he is unexpectedly unburdened of his duties, by the appearance of his mother’s old flame, he is forced to re-evaluate the walls that have prevented him from living the life he feels he has been denied.

Of the elements worthy of plaudits, the text itself must surely come foremost. Bennet’s wisdom and insight into human behaviour here showcase his wicked sense of irony, forming a landscape populated by detail and nuance, rich in texture and lending an authenticity in language and psychology that immerses us deep in the hopeless yearning of his protagonists.

 

 


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”