130

News

Maersk draws the line at bribes

Stephen Gadd
March 20th, 2017


This article is more than 7 years old.

So-called ‘facilitation payments’ are an unfortunate reality in shipping

Maersk Line has 600 container ships calling at ports worldwide (photo: Tvabutzku1234)

Ask any captain and he will tell you that in certain ports, if you want to ensure that your ship receives proper service, you will have to give small gifts to officials, pilots and the harbour authorities.

At an anti-corruption course held recently at Malmö’s World Maritime University, Maersk Captain Morten Busch put it even more bluntly: “At one particular port it was common practice for officials to demand cartons of cigarettes as a facilitation payment to enter. As pressure grew for us to cut these payments to zero, it became a battle.”

Greasing the wheels
These ‘facilitation payments’, although illegal in most places around the world, have often been necessary in order to get Maersk’s container ships quickly and painlessly out of various harbours.

READ MORE: Monster maritime deal: Maersk acquires huge German shipping company

Maersk has more than 600 container ships, so the cumulative cost of paying up is potentially very high.

Enough is enough
However, that is all over now, Maersk Line’s anti-corruption chief, Kristin Berglund, told DR Nyheder. “We’ve almost eradicated facilitation payments in Maersk Line.”

According to Berglund, the extent of facilitation payments has fallen by 87 percent from 2015 to 2016. This is partly because Maersk captains now refuse demands for bribery point-blank. They also have access to a database that can inform them in advance as to what problems they might meet at the next port, and they have access to a 24-hour hotline if problems arise.

Even though the news that Maersk ships don’t pay bribes has spread, personnel are still put under massive pressure to pay up, according to Berglund.

“Passports have been impounded, there have been arguments, and threats of fines and crew members being arrested, so there is still a lot of pressure on our crews to make facilitation payments.”


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”