190

News

Denmark’s ambitious goal to reduce ammonia emissions by 24 percent proves unrealistic

Lucie Rychla
March 20th, 2017


This article is more than 7 years old.

Farmers might be forced to kill thousands of pigs and cows

A future victim of Denmark’s ambitous goals? (photo: Pixabay)

Denmark’s obligation to the EU to reduce the ammonia (NH3) emissions  of its agriculture industry by 24 percent by 2020 has proven over-ambitious and unrealistic, stated the environment and food minister, Esben Lunde Larsen, last week.

The minister now fears Danish farmers will be forced to kill large parts of their livestock to live up to the country’s obligations.

“Right now, the Dutch agriculture sector is slaughtering 150,000 cows because it cannot reach EU targets for phosphorous emissions,” Larsen told Finans.

“My big fear is that Denmark is on its way to a similar situation. It may result in reduced agricultural production, a loss of jobs at slaughterhouses and dairies, and a setback for exports.”

READ MORE: EU rejects Denmark’s bid to reduce ammonia emissions

Own your own decision
The decision to commit to a 24 percent reduction in NH3 emissions, while other EU countries only pledged to reduce their levels by as little as 2 percent, was made by the former Helle Thorning-Schmidt-led government.

The former environment and food minister, Eva Kjer Hansen, tried to negotiate a lower rate back in July 2015, but the EU’s environment commissioner, Karmenu Vella, rejected her plea.

According to Vella, Denmark had pledged the figure and therefore must live up to it.

READ MORE: Denmark looking to reduce ammonia emission obligations

Negative consequences
Current projections show that ammonia emissions from the agriculture industry in Denmark continue to fall, but at a much slower pace than anticipated.

By 2020, levels will have fallen by “only” 20 percent and by 2035 an additional 2 percent.

“We could immediately see the goals were unrealistic because we had already at that point reduced [ammonia] emissions very significantly,” Lars Hvidtfeldt, the deputy chairman of the Danish Agriculture and Food Council, told Finans.

“It is a scandal that such a big goal – one that will have enormous, negative consequences for an entire industry – was adopted without any public debate.”

Between 1990 and 2013, Danish agriculture managed to reduce its ammonia emissions by 41 percent.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”