155

Business

Danish banks not focused enough on money laundering laws, rules FSA

Amelia Axelsen
March 15th, 2017


This article is more than 7 years old.

Government intends to make amendments to law in response of report’s findings

The hunt continues in the wake of the Panama Papers (photo: ICIJ.org)

The Danish banking industry has not done enough to curb money laundering in foreign tax havens, according to a Financial Supervisory Authority (FSA) review in the wake of the Panama Papers leak in April 2016.

Brian Mikkelsen, the business minister, has indicated today that he intends to amend the Money Laundering Act to address the failure of the industry to take decisive action.

Not sufficiently prioritised
Despite the FSA issuing guidelines that banks should not help customers “conceal, store or transport” funds and actively discourage all efforts to avoid paying tax, it concludes that money laundering “has not been sufficiently reviewed or sufficiently prioritised”.

“It is crucial that the top management levels in the banks are aware of their role and responsibility in money laundering cases, and it is unsatisfactory that a number of banks are in clear violation of legislation,” added Mikkelsen.

“I believe there is a need for initiatives that focus on increased leadership responsibilities.”

Eight banks reviewed
The Panama Papers, which comprised 11.5 million leaked documents from the Panamanian tax solutions firm Mossack Fonseca, implicated several banks and institutions that operate in Denmark, including Jyske Bank and Nordea.

Eight major banks were informed by the FSA in May 2016 that they were under review. They were asked to submit customer information and others information to assess if they were in violation of any Danish or European Union legislation.

The FSA report confirms that no new violations have been committed since May 2016 release and that any previous violations have been reported to the police.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”