174

Things to do

Performance review: A classy study of physicality and sexuality

Ben Hamilton
February 28th, 2017


This article is more than 7 years old.

‘After Miss Julie’ is highly recommended ★★★★★

Embrace the energy of this scintillating play and you’ll be rewarded (photo: Thattheatre.com)

Benjamin Stender’s accent certainly has an interesting bouquet. Hints of Kentish and Cornish, and also an unmistakable Irish aroma – yes, definitely the dulcet tones of Jonathan Rhys Meyers from the Woody Allen film ‘Match Point’ and the occasional Littlefinger whisper from ‘Game of Thrones’.

But while British Isles viewers of  ‘After Miss Julie’ – a compelling examination of class and humanity set in Britain just months after the end of World War II – might initially think they’ve gatecrashed the filming of a Benneton advert at the European Parliament (neither of the female leads manages to completely conceal her Danish roots), this was another extraordinary That Theatre production at Krudttønden.

READ MORE: At the crack of dawn, they woke up to a new world order

The chauffeur, the maid, the lady
Following on from his directorial debut in the autumn of 2015 with the energetic ‘Marathon’, overall That Theatre governor Ian Burns has assembled another young cast bursting with vitality, and their endeavour is no less vigorous, albeit more arduous.

Benjamin Stender – quickly emerging as Burns’s go-to leading man following standout performances in ‘The Woman in Black’ and ‘Marathon’, and also as a splendidly malevolent Hamlet at Kronborg Castle last summer – is the chauffeur stuck between the motherly affections of his doting fiancee, the maid (Johanne Wang-Holm), and the amorous advances of the lady of the house, the eponymous Miss Julie (Maria Winther Nørgaard).

The dramatis personae sounds familiar somehow …

Masterclass in physicality
A moustache borrowed from Errol Flynn doesn’t quite suit Stender, an actor who will never be short of female fans, but it’s effective as it nullifies his good looks, and this is key to his performance.

Initially, he cuts an unimpressive Uriah Heep-type figure: servile, self-serving and most probably in aftershock following his service in World War II, which was cut short due to his weak chest. But having sex with the lady of the house lets off an incendiary device that explodes his ego, not dissimilar to the one that is going to bring down Winston Churchill’s government and empower a whole nation at the 1945 General Election, the backdrop of the play.

When he emerges post-coital midway through the play, it is as a man transformed. No longer a wheezy weed with an ill-advised moustache, he exudes sexuality through every pore, whether he’s on the attack, getting slapped or being genitally poleaxed – all choreographed in collaboration with Burns, a master of physicality himself.

Seducing the seducer
It’s a credit to both actors how they convey they’ve just had sex, and the foreplay is pretty sensational as well. Crisp movements, flexed and inclined limbs and once again superb direction combine to involve the audience in the seduction, although it’s never completely clear who’s seducing who.

Central to this is Nørgaard’s enchanting performance as a privileged socialite who cannot clearly see beyond the confines of her cossetted existence. Her misty eyes expertly betray a paternally-born vulnerability, and she is a perfect foil for Stender. Physically they couldn’t be a better match, and when they embrace or kiss, sparks fly.

Wang-Holm, meanwhile, conducts herself at a different pace, anchoring the play in an assured fashion that really makes you believe she’s working in domestic service in 1945. She inhabits the drama’s quieter moments, which stay with you long after the curtain has fallen.

Strong production values
Overall, this is a highly polished play with strong production values that does great credit to Patrick Marber’s 1995 reimagining of August Strindberg’s 1888 original Swedish-set play, which way back then was first performed in Copenhagen at a student union after it was deemed too racy by the theatre.

Background music heightens the tension of the play’s pivotal moments, actors add to the authenticity by wolfing down liver and smoking copious amounts of cigarettes on stage, and a well thought-out stage enhances the storytelling.

A special mention must be made of Mark Jones whose innovative sound design has transformed That Theatre’s productions of late. A couple of years ago, the company invested in new technology, and it’s safe to say it is paying dividends.

Next up for That Theatre is ‘Educating Rita’ starring Burns and the super-talented Dawn Wall this autumn. But who would envy them having to go after Miss Julie?

photo: Lauge Felix Black Pedersen

 

 
 

 

 

Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”