132

News

Aarhus ends gender-segregated swimming

Christian Wenande
February 2nd, 2017


This article is more than 7 years old.

Detractors likened the decision to current US anti-immigration sentiment

Not everyone was pleased with the decision (photo: Kvindesvømningens Venner i Gellerupbadet)

Aarhus Municipality has decided to bring an end to gender-segregated swimming at its pools, despite the initiative being popular in Gellerup, an area with a high density of immigrants.

The lifting of the ban, which comes into effect this week, became a reality following a vote in which 26 of the 31 municipal council members voted in favour. Members of the two left-leaning parties, Radikale and Enhedslisten, were the only ones to vote against.

“I think there has been a debate about this for a long time now,” Gert Bjerregard, Venstre’s political spokesperson at Aarhus Municipality, told DR Nyheder.

“There are some people who want to discard some Danish values, and there is a large portion of City Hall who support those values to ensure better integration.”

Bjerregaard and Venstre proposed ending gender-segregated swimming in the spring of 2016, and the debate has raged formidably since then, particularly within the Muslim population, which is the most affected group.

READ MORE: More Danes getting into winter swimming

Totally Trump
Groups against the lifting of the ban have compared it to the anti-immigration sentiment being seen in the US at the moment with the ongoing travel ban drama.

“We think that you can draw parallels between Trump and Aarhus Municipality,” Elsebeth Fredriksen, the spokesperson for the group ‘Kvindesvømningens Venner i Gellerupbadet’ (‘Friends of Women’s Swimming in Gellerupbadet [swimmingpool]’), told DR Nyheder.

“That opinion they have regarding women’s swimming in Gellerup is quite misogynistic.”

The group organised a demonstration on the eve of the municipal vote, and some members wore the so-called ‘pussy hats’ that have become a key symbol in the fight of resistance against the new US president, Donald Trump.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”