266

News

Greenland landscape could become UNESCO Heritage site

Christian Wenande
January 19th, 2017


This article is more than 7 years old.

The culture minister, Mette Bock, submits application for historic Inuit hunting grounds Aasivissuit – Nipisat

A sprawling landscape rich in beauty, wildlife and history (photo: Jens Fog Jensen – Natural History Museum)

Denmark has submitted Greenland’s Inuit hunting grounds ‘Aasivissuit – Nipisat’ to become a UNESCO’s World Heritage site.

The Arctic landscape could potentially become the ninth culture and nature gem to be included from the Danish Commonwealth on UNESCO’s list of valuable world culture and nature heritage sites.

“We have many cultural pearls and beautiful nature areas in the commonwealth that we need to protect and raise awareness of,” said the culture minister, Mette Bock.

“The unique hunting landscape Aasivissuit – Nipisat in Greenland is an obvious candidate to be added to the world heritage list, so I’ve submitted an application to UNESCO so even more people can become aware of the attractions we have on offer.”

READ MORE: Denmark gets two new places on the UNESCO World Heritage List

A Greenland double?
Aasivissuit – Nipisat covers an area of almost 4,000 square kilometres, making it larger than Funen and its surrounding islands, and it also contains numerous ruins and ancient monuments that document the earliest migration of humans to Greenland around 4,500 years ago.

The area is located in the central part of west Greenland between the towns of Kangerlussuaq and Sisimiut. The massive ice-free areas rich in wildlife in the ocean laid the foundation for the first people migrating to Greenland from North America all those millennia ago.

UNESCO is expected to make a decision regarding Aasivissuit – Nipisat during the summer of 2018, while the south Greenland landscape of Kujataa will be up for discussion this coming summer.

The commonwealth currently has eight sites on UNESCO’s World Heritage List: Kronborg Castle, Roskilde Cathedral, the Jelling Stones, the Stevns Klint white chalk cliffs in Zealand, the Vadehavet Sea (Wadden Sea), the Ilulissat Ice Fjord in Greenland, the Moravian Church Settlement in Christiansfeld and King Christian V’s forest in northern Zealand – the latter two made the list in 2015.

Check out the complete UNESCO World Heritage list here.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”