117

News

Government proposes more stringent permanent residence legislation

Christian Wenande
January 16th, 2017


This article is more than 7 years old.

Years required to stay in Denmark upped to eight as government aims to toughen stance against PR applicants

Getting tough on permanent residency applicants again (photo: Voice For Justice Greencard Denmark)

Friday the 13th is considered unlucky for some, and last Friday those hankering for permanent residence in Denmark must have felt the same.

Less than a year after Parliament passed more stringent rules regarding permanent residence on 26 January 2016, the government has proposed applying even tougher legislation to the area.

The proposal would increase the number of years that applicants must have spent in Denmark to eight, instead of the current six – a year ago it was the EU-standard five – while applicants would need to have worked full-time for 3.5 out of the last four years (as opposed to 2.5 out of the last three as it is now).

The prospective new law would also mean applicants would not be permitted to have acquired any social assistance for the past four years (instead of the current three), while those with prison convictions of six months or more can never be given permanent residence (instead of the current one year or more).

Furthermore, there would be a six-year waiting period for applicants who have received a suspended prison sentence.

READ MORE: Immigration lawyer: Government and DF are ‘sneaking in’ stricter permanent residence rules

Unintended impact
Aage Kramp, a noted immigration lawyer and head of the law firm ImLaw (imlaw.dk), said that many people would be left in the lurch unintentionally.

“The six-years waiting time for criminal records would for example impact on au-pairs convicted of not informing the authorities that they have a child back in their home nation, or those convicted of not having divorced properly before entering into a new marriage,” Kramp told CPH POST.

According to Kramp, the good news is that, opposed to last year, the new law proposal would not be approved completely retroactively – most probably due to the intense protest from the over 1,300 applicants who were impacted.

“This time the law stipulates that you can still apply from today, and until the law is presented first (out of three) times for debate in the Danish Parliament. This date is unknown and will probably not be published beforehand,” said Kramp.

“So apply immediately if you are close to fulfilling the present rules, and seek professional advice (usually 2,000 kroner for a consultation) or application support  (usually 10,000 kroner in total) if you are in doubt.”


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”