109

News

Danish bank under fire for Dakota Access Pipeline investment

Christian Wenande
December 2nd, 2016


This article is more than 8 years old.

The Standing Rock Sioux Tribe pleads for Nordea to pull out its reported 360 million Swedish kroner investment in companies involved in the controversial project

The protest has stirred a nation (photo: Standing Rock Dakota Access Pipeline Opposition)

With Brexit, the circus of a US election and a host of favourite artists passing away, 2016 has been a year to forget for a lot of people. But for Nordea Bank, it’s been a downright travesty.

Last week, it was revealed that the bank had the most dissatisfied bank customers in Denmark thanks to its role in the Panama Papers scandal and IT issues. Now another ‘shitstorm’ beckons as Nordea has been drawn into the highly-contentious Dakota Access Pipeline debacle in the US.

The Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, which is protesting against the construction of the 1,886 km underground Dakota Access Pipeline stretching from North Dakota to Illinois, has written an open letter to Nordea urging the bank to cease its investment in firms associated with the pipeline project.

“I have recently learned that Nordea has invested a significant amount – reported to be 360 million Swedish kroner – in companies directly involved in the Dakota Access pipeline project: Energy Transfer Partners, Sunoco Logistics Partners and Phillips 66,” wrote Dave Archambault, the chairman of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, in the letter.

“On behalf of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, I am asking you to uphold your strong principles of corporate responsibility, and I am calling upon you to immediately withdraw your investments in the companies that are involved in the project.”

READ MORE: Nordea’s banking customers least loyal

Nordea investigating
Native American tribes and environmental organisations fear the pipeline will contaminate the Missouri River, one of the most essential water sources of the region. Their protests at the construction site have led to a number of dramatic confrontations with the local authorities.

Greenpeace Denmark handed over the Standing Rock Sioux letter to Nordea in Copenhagen, Stockholm and Helsinki. In Copenhagen, Eric Pedersen, the head of Nordic Invest, accepted the letter on the front steps of Nordea’s headquarters in Christianshavn.

“We can understand that this case is controversial and we take it very seriously,” said Pedersen.

“We are currently looking into the situation and we have contacted all the companies that have taken part in the construction of the pipeline. On Monday we will visit the area and have an opportunity to speak directly with the parties.”

Nordea contends it has repeatedly tried to get into contact with the Standing Rock Sioux in recent weeks, but its efforts have been in vain.

Receiving the letter (photo: Nordea)

Receiving the letter (photo: Nordea)


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”