385

Business & Education

Star hysteria, Satchmo-style at Central Station Copenhagen

Jane Graham
November 30th, 2016


This article is more than 8 years old.

When Louis Armstrong first visited Copenhagen in 1933, the huge crowds were so eager to catch a glimpse of the jazz legend that his first thought was that they were there to lynch him

Louis Armstrong took Denmark by storm in 1933 and became one of the nation’s most loved musicians (photo: Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division)

Fans of Justin Bieber and the like may think that today’s pop stars have laid claim to being the first generation to suffer the lows as well as the highs of music stardom. But were Louis Armstrong alive today, he might offer a different take on such an assertion.

The US jazz musician was legendary all over the world, and his fan-base was no less devoted in Scandinavia, which he was to visit many times during his long and illustrious career.

As well as recording live sessions and concerts in Denmark and being a close acquaintance of Denmark’s most respected jazz musicians of the time – such as Svend Asmussen and Bent Fabricius-Bjerre – few who heard it will ever forget his rendition of the 1924 song named after the city itself: the much played ‘Copenhagen’.

Copenhagen connection
Armstrong was born in New Orleans in the US state of Louisiana on 4 August 1901. He grew up in abject poverty and spent much of his youth getting into trouble with the authorities. During this period of delinquency, he was sent to the New Orleans Home for Colored Waifs where he nurtured his talent playing the cornet in the band and was given some musical training.

His mentor, Joe ‘King’ Oliver, took him under his wing, and in 1922, he invited him to Chicago to join his creole jazz band – at that time the best and most influential in town. Stints in New York, LA and New Orleans duly followed as Armstrong’s reputation grew, firstly as a musician playing the cornet and trumpet, and then as a vocalist, with his trademark deep, gravelly, scat singing style.

From Capone’s mob to Copenhagen’s
By the time Armstrong embarked on his first European tour in 1933 – a decision taken partly to escape the Mob! – he was already a household name across most of the globe thanks to success with hits such as ‘Ain’t Misbehavin’ and Hoagy Carmichael’s ‘Stardust’.

Nicknamed ‘Satchmo’, an abbreviation of ‘Satchelmouth’, due to the comical way his cheeks would puff up like a satchel when he played the trumpet, he arrived at Copenhagen’s main train station in July 1933 to complete pandemonium. The 3,000 fans waiting there hoping to meet their idol came as quite a surprise to him.

According to music journalist Henrik W Iversen, an Armstrong enthusiast, the musician’s origins in the sharply-segregated and racially-prejudiced US Deep South seemed to come back to him as he saw the waiting mob.

“He had no idea that he was so popular in Europe, and when he saw so many people, his first thought was that they’d come to lynch him, he later admitted,” said Iversen.

Killing it at KB Hallen
The fans were apparently so frenzied that they started grabbing and pulling at Satchmo’s clothing, leaving the star half-undressed and in need of a whole new outfit.

This first impression did not deter Armstrong, who was without a doubt the biggest jazz name in Denmark up until the 1950s. By this time, Armstrong had embarked on a successful film career and had even appeared on the cover of Time magazine. When he visited Copenhagen he filled the spacious, and now burned down, KB Hallen music venue 13 times over in a period of six days, with two concerts a night and three on Saturdays.

Armstrong said that he liked visiting Scandinavia because the public understood how to listen to his music, something that the 1933 jazz film ‘Copenhagen – Kalundborg,’ in which Armstrong makes an appearance with many other jazz greats, testifies to.

A trumpeted legacy 
Every year during the Copenhagen Jazz Festival, stories of Satchmo and other jazz greats who have graced the city in the past are once again relived, as older jazz lovers relate the experience of witnessing some of music history’s most famous names, including Armstrong himself.

Louis Armstrong died of a heart attack on 6 July 1971, aged 69. Shortly before his death, he said: “I think I had a beautiful life. I didn’t wish for anything that I couldn’t get and I got pretty near everything I wanted because I worked for it.”

The legacy he left – a deep-rooted love of jazz – lives on in many musicians and fans, both home-grown and those who have chosen to make Denmark their base.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”