103

News

Conservationists hail Faroese ‘precedent’ that could make herding pilot whales illegal

Ben Hamilton
November 28th, 2016


This article is more than 8 years old.

Sea Shepherd Global guilty of driving a pod of dophins away from hunters participating in the grindadráp

A dramatic chase ensued prior to the seizure (photo: Sea Shepherd Global)

A decision made by a court in the Faroe Islands on November 24 may set a precedent that is harmful to the islands’ tradition of hunting pilot whales, claims Sea Shepherd Global, a group that has been opposing the practice with ‘direct-action tactics’ since the 1980s.

Caused “unnecessary suffering” 
The Danish court in the Faroese capital of Tórshavn ruled the captain of a Sea Shepherd vessel breached Faroese animal welfare laws by causing “unnecessary suffering” to a pod of Atlantic white-sided dolphins in September 2014.

The vessel, under the command of British captain Jessie Treverton, was attempting to herd away the animals from one of the 23 approved beaches used by the Faroese hunters taking part in the grindadráp – the annual slaughter of 800 cetaceans, most of which are pilot whales.

Sets a precedent
Sea Shepherd celebrated the verdict – which carried with it a fine of 5,500 kroner and the return of its boat, which had been seized by the Danish armed forces and then held by the Faroese authorities for two years – as a victory, claiming it set a precedent that driving or herding dolphins is illegal.

“I am very happy to accept the court’s verdict that my driving a pod of dolphins to safety was against animal welfare laws, because if the law applies to me then it surely must also apply to the Faroese people,” said Treverton via a Sea Shepherd press release.

“A legal precedent has been set: driving dolphins is against Faroese law. This is a victory for the oceans.”

A “landmark ruling”
“This is exactly what the Faroese boats do when they herd pods of pilot whales onto the killing beaches to be slaughtered,” added Geert Vons, Sea Shepherd’s campaign leader in the Faroes, who hailed the verdict as a “landmark ruling”.

bc690117917d32a3_800x800ar


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”