98

News

The efterløn effect: Rise in EU retirement age not replicated in Denmark

Ben Hamilton
November 15th, 2016


This article is more than 8 years old.

Danes only working for 0.2 years longer than they were in 2005, compared to a European average of 1.9

Denmark failing to keep up with increase in retirement age (photo: Pixabay)

Despite ever-increasing political will to encourage citizens to work up to and beyond the 65-year retirement age, Danes are only remaining in employment for 0.2 years longer than they were in 2005, according to new Eurostat figures.

The Danish increase was a long way short of the 1.9-year average in the EU, where governments are increasingly addressing escalating numbers of pensioners by encouraging them to remain employed.

Efterløn mainly to blame
The Danish government has been no slouch. According to a 2011 reform, the retirement age will rise to 67 in 2022 and eventually to 69.

But any significant increase in the average retirement age in Denmark over the last decade has been held back by the state-subsidised, early retirement program efterløn, which enables Danes to retire at the age of 60, and has proven to be a huge drain on the public coffers.

When it was first introduced in 1979 as a means to create more jobs for young people, the projections fell a long way short of the reality – just 17 percent of the eventual figure in fact – and in 2009, 135,503 Danes were on efterløn at an annual cost of 37 billion kroner.

However, the 2011 reform changed the conditions for early retirement, and the numbers have since fallen heavily.

READ MORE: More than expected likely to forego early retirement scheme

In the workplace longer
In Malta, the average worker remains in employment for 5.1 more years than they did in 2005.

Nevertheless, Danes spend an average 39.2 years in employment, placing them third in the EU only behind the Netherlands (39.9) and Sweden (41.2).

This could partially be attributed to those countries’ rosy employment figures. The average in Italy, for example, is 30.7.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”