115

News

Law proposal will hinder Danes abroad returning with foreign spouses

Christian Wenande
November 14th, 2016


This article is more than 8 years old.

Cutting the ’26-year rule’ will leave thousands of Danes with international families in limbo

But bringing him/her home might be a problem (photo: Jacob Truedson Demitz)

The association for Danes living abroad, Danes Worldwide, contends that the government’s plan to scrap the ’26-year rule’ will be a serious roadblock for Danes living abroad looking to return home with their international partners and families.

Axing the ‘exception to attachment’ rule – which ignores the ‘connection to Denmark’ requirement if a person was born in Denmark (or came to Denmark as a child) and has lived in Denmark for 26 years – means that Danes will in future have to prove their connection to Denmark is stronger than their connection to whatever country they lived in abroad.

“It’s absurd for Danes to have to prove their connection to the fatherland when they return home with a foreign spouse,” said Anne Marie Dalsgaard, the secretary general of Danes Worldwide.

“Furthermore, it’s wrong for Denmark to erect barriers that prevent many of its citizens, who have fallen in love outside the nation’s borders, from returning home with their non-Danish partners.”

READ MORE: Danes worldwide celebrate as dual citizenship become official

Biggest ‘immigration group’
Dalsgaard contends that scrapping the law will lead to Denmark losing out on thousands of highly-skilled workers keen to return home to Denmark at some point with their foreign spouses.

In its report ‘UdlandsDanmark’ (Denmark abroad), Danes Worldwide contends that about 20,000 Danes return home to Denmark from abroad every year – making them the largest ‘immigrant group’ in Denmark.

As part of its survey of over 1,000 Danes living in 61 nations, Danes Worldwide found that 66 percent of respondents had lived over ten years abroad in total, 50 percent lived within Europe, and 49 percent lived abroad because of their careers.

Some 47 percent said they visited Denmark between two and four times a year, and 44 percent said they expected to settle down in Denmark again at some point.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”