344

News

Danish designer loses counterfeiting case against supermarket chain

TheCopenhagenPost
November 9th, 2016


This article is more than 8 years old.

Court decides that rubber boots aren’t knockoffs

Designer said supermarket boots were rip-offs (photo: YouTube)

Danish design company Ilse Jacobsen has lost its battle with Dansk Supermarked over claims the supermarket chain was selling counterfeits of its goods.

The successful Danish designer claimed that Dansk Supermarked was selling knockoffs of its renowned rubber boots at its Bilka stores.

Ilse Jacobsen demanded 822,091 kroner in compensation, but the Maritime and Commercial Court found in favour of Dansk Supermarked, ruling that the designer is liable for the 100,000 kroner in costs it spent fighting the suit against the chain and Footmark, the company that supplied the boots.

Not close enough
The court decided the boots being sold at the supermarket were not similar enough to Ilse Jacobsen’s footwear to constitute infringement.

“Counterfeit products are not good for customers, us or the brand manufacturers,”  Kasper Reggelsen, a communications consultant for Dansk Supermarked, told Finans.

“We do not imitate other traders’ copyrights, so we are of course pleased that we have been successful in court.”

Not the first time
Representatives from Ilse Jacobsen expressed disappointment with the verdict and said they are researching whether they can appeal against the outcome.

READ MORE: Owning counterfeits in Denmark

This is not the first time that Ilse Jacobsen and Dansk Supermarked have met in court over counterfeit goods.

In 2005, Ilse Jacobsen filed an injunction against Netto – also owned by Dansk Supermaked – to stop sales of what the designer felt were illegal copies of their patented fashion rubber boots. That case ended with a settlement.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”