109

News

Washington a little baffled by US ambassador’s reality show

Ben Hamilton
October 21st, 2016


This article is more than 8 years old.

Unexpected success of TV series gives it a wider reach than imagined, but John Kerry has no issues with it

Meet the cast of ‘I am the Ambassador from America’ (photo: Hasse Ferrold)

Rufus Gifford, the US ambassador to Denmark, did not obtain formal state department approval to film the popular reality TV series ‘Jeg er ambassadøren fra Amerika’ (‘I am the Ambassador from America’), reports the Wall Street Journal.

However, there is no suggestion that Gifford faces a rap on the knuckles in Washington DC, where according to the newspaper “some officials said privately they were baffled that an ambassador was the star of a reality show”.

The US secretary of state, John Kerry, has sent Gifford a “nice note” in support of the show, according to the US State Department.

Now an international hit
Originally made for Danish television, where two five-episode seasons have screened on the public broadcast channel DR3, the series has since been acquired by Netflix and made available in countries such as the US and UK – significantly increasing its potential reach.

READ MORE: Rufus Gifford, the US ambassador to Denmark: soon to be known as The Ambassador

While it has enjoyed generally positive reviews, the WSJ warned that “reality-television fans seeking drama might be disappointed” by the mundane nature of the show.

Not everyone’s convinced
A reality show expert, Jason Carbone, questioned whether an ambassador was a good subject – i.e not on medication.

“When you make a reality show, you need people that are wide open, that aren’t editing themselves, that aren’t thinking ‘Oh my God, what are people going to think?’,” he said.

“But I’m sorry, if you’re an ambassador for the United States and cameras are following you around, you are thinking about everything.”

The wife would Cain me
James Cain, the US ambassador to Denmark from 2005-09 chipped in that he was a fan, but couldn’t imagine doing the show himself.

“If I had told my wife I was going to bring the TV cameras into our bedroom, I would have spent four years living in the doghouse,” he said.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”