101

News

Denmark praises landmark greenhouse gas agreement

Christian Wenande
October 17th, 2016


This article is more than 8 years old.

197 nations agree to reduce the emissions of the potent hydrofluorocarbons

History made in Kigali (photo: UNEP)

Officials from nearly 200 nations secured a historic deal over the weekend at the ‘Meeting of the Parties to Montreal Protocol’ in Kigali, Rwanda to reduce the emission of the potent greenhouse gases, hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs).

The Danish official in Kigali, Mikkel Aaman Søren, praised the step that could curb global warming by more than 0.5 degrees by the end of the century.

“The agreement is a huge victory for the environment on a global scale,” said Søren.

“Denmark has long been a leader in limiting HFC gases. Over the past 15 years we have reduced the use of HFC gases by almost 70 percent. There is little doubt that Denmark takes the global temperature increases very seriously, and it is essential that the countries of the world have agreed to follow suit.”

READ MORE: New grass to reduce cow-burping methane emissions

Cooling the world
The deal is expected to save the environment from about 65 billion tonnes of CO2 looking ahead to 2050, which is over 1,000 times what Denmark emitted in 2014.

The Montreal Protocol aims to protect the ozone layer by phasing out the production and the use of a number of gases – such as HCFC and CFC – which break down the ozone layer.

HFC gases are commonly found in refrigeration and air conditioning units. Driven primarily by the increased demand for cooling in developing nations that have fast-expanding middle classes living in hot climates, they are the world’s fastest-growing greenhouse gases.

Under the agreement in Kigali, developing countries will begin phasing out HFC gases by 2019 and completely abolish them by 2028 at the latest.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”