341

News

Danish newspaper releases book banned by national security agency

Lucie Rychla
October 9th, 2016


This article is more than 8 years old.

‘Seven years for PET’ is based on interviews with the former head of the agency, Jakob Scharf

PET decided to ban the book without even reading it, claims Politiken’s editor in chief (photo: People’s Press)

Danish newspaper Politiken has today published the entire contents of the book ‘Seven years for PET – the times of Jakob Scharf’ (‘Syv år for PET – Jakob Scharfs tid’), which has been banned by the national intelligence and security authority, PET.

On Friday afternoon, PET successfully obtained an injunction against the sales of the disputed book at the Copenhagen City Court, which also ordered several Danish media, including Radio24syv and Ekstra Bladet, not to publish content from the book.

According to Marianne Pedersen – the CEO of Indeks Retail, which owns two of the country’s largest bookstore chains, Bog & Idé and Bøger & Papir – the company has to pay between 100,000 and 130,000 kroner for losing the court case.

Meanwhile, PET has issued a statement that the agency will not continue to pursue the injunction, because Politiken’s rapid action has doomed the court’s decision meaningless.

READ MORE: Guardian journalist tries to shed light on ‘Danishness’

Banned book available online
‘Syv år for PET’ was written by Morten Skjoldager, a journalist at Politiken, and published by People’s Press.

It is based in part on interviews with Jakob Scharf, who served as the head of the Danish security authority between 2007 and 2013.

Christian Jensen, the editor-in-chief at Politiken, has criticised that neither PET nor the district court had read the book before they decided to have it banned.

“If PET can ban books or newspaper articles without any concrete evidence to support its suspicion, then we have accepted that an intelligence service acts as a censor that undermines the freedom of press,” Jensen told DR.

Politiken decided to release the book both in a special Sunday edition of the newspaper and online, where it is available to subscribers for free.

It is not the first time the newspaper has published  from a banned book.

One of the most famous examples is the book ‘Commissioner’s Diary’ (‘Kommissærens Dagbog’) from 1995 about the experiences of Ritt Bjerregaard as a European commissioner.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”