143

News

Warring blue bloc parties generally satisfied with PM’s stance

Lucie Rychla
October 4th, 2016


This article is more than 8 years old.

Will new property tax measures address DF’s worries over income tax cuts?

Parliament reopened today, sending the media into overdrive as the prime minister, Lars Løkke Rasmussen, delivered his opening address, mainly revisiting the points of the 2017-25 strategy his government announced on August 30.

Many had been predicting a tough Tuesday for the PM and his party Venstre, but the general consensus following his speech is that one of the ‘warring parties’ in his blue bloc, Liberal Alliance (LA), will re-enter the budget negotiations with renewed optimism.

While the other, Dansk Folkeparti, which strongly opposes LA’s desire for tax cuts for the rich, noted it was extremely satisfied with the PM’s plans for a new property tax that will benefit and protect Danish homeowners.

READ MORE: Danish PM must overcome blue bloc deadlock to proceed with budget plans

PM urged to cut taxes
However, DF might have a fight on its hands if it wants to stop the government introducing tax cuts. Earlier today, Dansk Erhverv (the Danish Chamber of Commerce) called on the Danish government to implement the measure among new initiatives that would boost economic growth in the country.

According to Jens Klarskov, the CEO of Dansk Erhverv, the Danish economy has been stagnating for the past five years and the government needs to motivate more people to seek jobs by reducing income tax.

READ MORE: Danes scrambling to set up companies

Klarskov contends the slow economic growth is largely down to low investments in business and proposes a reduction in taxes to make Denmark more attractive for international investors as well as continued investment in education and technology.

“We must invest in the future through targeted education, continuous digitalisation and industry-relevant research,” Klarskov stated.

Dansk Erhverv argues that the public sector should become more efficient and that politicians should challenge existing systems with new initiatives in relation to citizens’ freedom of choice, competition exposure and public-private partnerships.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”