5647

Business & Education

Carmen Curlers: a national treasure

Rebecca K Engmann
September 21st, 2016


This article is more than 8 years old.

No washing, no waiting – men of the 1960s could fake a boutique coiffure with 10-minute hot curlers peddled by a Zealand entrepreneur

Few girls can resist curls (photo: SAS)

Pricey salon curl? – only her hairstylist knew for sure! Carmen Curlers were a baby of the plastic-fantastic 1960s, enabling busy working women and housewives alike to achieve salon-quality curly tresses in just ten minutes.

With the help of a dreamy advertising campaign (“Become a new woman in 10 minutes!”), the electric curling sets sold like hotcakes from shelves in this country and abroad, becoming the tools-of-the-trade of every fashion-conscious lady of the times.

So where did Carmen Curlers come from – and where on earth did they go?

Unlikely beginnings in Jyderup
It’s hard to imagine how women slept before the advent of home hot rollers – quite literally. Women were known to suffer many sleepless nights with a head-full of plastic curlers – or even orange-juice cans – before the brilliant idea of a hotter, faster curler came about.

Although thermal hair curlers date back as far as 1930 (the innovation was formally credited to an African-American inventor, Solomon Harper), it took the mid-20th century age of home convenience and an unlikely man from Jyderup in Zealand to make hot curlers a staple of every woman’s toilette.

Arne Bybjerg Pedersen was a former radio-dealer from Jyderup, who pulled up stakes and started a factory in Kalundborg in 1964. His aim: to produce electric hair curlers. His market: the housewife with no means for a salon ‘do’, and the working woman with no time. Carmen Curlers were born.

Kurly Kalunborg klondike
Bybjerg Pedersen employed plenty of women in the Carmen Curlers factory – an overwhelming majority of the 3,500-strong workforce were female. Orders rolled in from all over Europe and the US. By the time of the factory’s peak-production year, 1969, Bybjerg Pedersen had decided to sell out when Miss Clairol came knocking. Clairol made the radio-dealer from Jyderup an offer he couldn’t refuse: 250,000 kroner and a powerful, albeit campy name, Carmen Clairol.

Clairol also brought the company an aggressive, jet-set marketing strategy. By the 1970s, the firm had introduced a brand new product to the Carmen line. ‘Swingsetters’ were a junior-sized version of the original Carmen Curlers, intended for travel-use and ’emergency help at the office’.

The official spokesman for Carmen Swingsetters was Europe’s top hairdresser, the mono-monikered ‘Angart’. While Angart traipsed around Europe with Swingsetters and a bevy of hair models demonstrating 10-minute magic, Carmen Clairol flew in fashion editors from around the globe to see the curlers spring to life at the Kalundborg factory.

Permanent wave killed the curler star
But the 1980s would take its toll on Carmen Curlers’ rising star. The popularity of the ’80s permanent wave, as well as the more streamlined curling-iron, took a bite out of Carmen Clairol’s profits.

In 1990, the US-owned company closed down the Kalundborg factory and cut costs by moving production to Asia. The layoffs were devastating to the region. Throughout the 1990s, Kalundborg County bankrolled the sharp increase in the number of premature pensioners, plagued by back and arm problems caused by the drudgery of daily factory labour. The unemployment rate for women in the area remains high to this day, with many of the factory’s female workforce unable to find work elsewhere.

A song for Carmen
Sadly, there’s no such product as a Carmen Curler today. Clairol sold the patent, and its interest in the business venture, to the Remington company in 1993. The ‘Smart Setter’, ‘Care Setter’ and ‘Express Roller’, hot in just 90 seconds, are all godchildren of the original Kalundborg classic. But the name continues to ride the wave of household familiarity in this country. As Horsens appliance-dealer Birthe Jensen told Politiken’s ‘Where Are They Now?’ column several years back, even after the turn of the millennium, customers still ask for Carmen Curlers by name.

“Many women have discovered that the hairstyle holds longer if, instead of a turn with the curling-iron, they start the day with five hot curlers in the hair. It still takes just ten minutes – and so you can drink your morning coffee while you do it,” Jensen said.

A search for ‘Carmen Curlers’ on the internet reveals that they are still a national treasure of sorts – it’s the name of a world-renowned gay and lesbian choral group based in Copenhagen for over 25 years.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”