98

News

Peaking fast, dying young: bucking the trend of Flo-Jo

Ben Hamilton
August 23rd, 2016


This article is more than 8 years old.

The 1988 Olympic sprint champ is the exception to the rule, according to a study that shows early developers tend to age faster

Ronald and Florence: they both peaked late in their career (photo: Courtesy Ronald Reagan Library)

Florence Delorez Griffith Joyner peaked late and died early, but drug cheats often prove to be the exception to the rule, unless they’re the norm like in cycling.

According to new research from a joint Dutch-Danish study, Flo-Jo bucks a trend that tends to see athletes who reach an early high physical performance die earlier. It doesn’t bode well for Wayne Rooney.

More likely to die young
The joint study by the Center for Healthy Ageing at the University of Copenhagen (KU) and the Leyden Academy on Vitality and Ageing in the Netherlands found that early-peaking athletes had a 17 percent increased mortality compared to athletes who peaked later.

Based on the records of over 1,000 athletes who competed in the Olympics between 1896 and 1936 across 58 different disciplines, the researchers suggest that athletes with biological mechanisms that enable them to peak early – primarily sex and growth hormones – also age faster.

It concludes that early-peaking, high-performing athletes live on average five fewer years than athletes who peak late and do not attain a really high level of performance.

Sport still a healthy option
“We all know athletes can become ill, suffer accidents or even die while they train or compete, but next to these direct costs, our data indicates there are also long-term costs – in terms of lost years of life,” explained one of the researchers, Professor Rudi Westendorp from KU.

However, he cautioned against early-peaking athletes turning their back on sport.

“Sport is healthy, especially if you are slowly and continuously exercising. It seems to be the most successful strategy for a long and healthy life,” he said.

“Remember! It is never too late to start.”


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”