393

News

Pilou’s euphoria at landing plum role in Ben-Hur turning into grey joy

Ben Hamilton
August 18th, 2016


This article is more than 8 years old.

The critics haven’t been kind to the Danish rising star’s portrayal of Pontius Pilate

Where are the the People’s Front of Judea when you need them?

As the 1st century Judean governor who sentenced Jesus Christ to death, Pontius Pilate has perhaps understandably become one of cinema’s most enigmatic roles. Selecting an actor to portray him is a carte blanche casting choice.

Like James Bond’s Felix Leiter and the Devil himself, an eclectic range of actors have portrayed him over the years, from the likes of British actors Hugh Bonneville, Gary Oldman, and Michael Palin to Americans Harvey Keitel and Rod Steiger – and even David Bowie.

READ MORE: Yet another Dane in ‘Game of Thrones’

No stopping this kid, or is there?
So, it was yet another boost to the rapidly rising star of Pilou Asbæk (Euron Greyjoy in ‘Game of Thrones’) when he landed the role in this year’s biggest remake, ‘Ben-Hur’, which has just been released in the US ahead of a September 1 opening in Denmark.

Sadly for Asbæk, the reviews haven’t been kind so far – to the film, which has scored a meagre 42 on Metacritic, or the 34-year-old Danish actor.

Too square, not rugged
Entertainment Weekly found Asbæk “so square compared to past Pilates Gary Oldman and David Bowie”, while Empire magazine suggested he was “aiming for the ruggedness of Russell Crowe but ending up closer to Pacey Witter” – the other lead male character in ‘Dawson’s Creek’. Ouch!

Overall, the media have concluded the remake isn’t worthy of William Wyler’s 1959 epic ‘Ben-Hur’ and given a big thumbs down to the film’s action sequences, with the Hollywood Reporter describing its ten-minute chariot scene as “incompetent and incoherent”.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”