80

News

Dropping battery cage eggs not necessarily good, says professor

TheCopenhagenPost
August 3rd, 2016


This article is more than 8 years old.

Numbers reveal that caged hens often live longer than free-rangers

Cozy (photo: Snowmanradio)

Many Danish supermarkets are vowing to remove eggs from battery caged hens from their shelves.

Removing those eggs in favour of free range, organic and other alternatives is a misunderstanding of animal welfare, according to Peter Sandøe, a former chairman of the animal ethics council Dyreetisk Råd, who is a professor of bioethics.

“When you look at how things are going with the hens in the free range system, there are some serious problems,” Sandøe told DR Nyheder.

“They are attacked and pecked and many actually die before they are slaughtered.”

Safer in cages
The professor said the numbers show that caged hens often live longer than their counterparts on the range.

While only 3.5 percent of cage hens die before slaughter, 6 percent of organically-farmed hens and 10 percent of free range hens meet an early demise.

“The mortality rate in the free range system is three times higher,” he said.

READ MORE: Danish supermarkets Netto and Foetex to stop the sale of battery-cage eggs

Sandøe said the free range practice of having between 3,000 and 15,000 chicks living in large groups is contrary to their nature, and that modern cages mimic a hen’s natural state more closely than free ranging does.

“The cages we have today are not the same as in the old days,” he said. “Today, they have access to a nesting box, perch and scratching space.”

Not so fast
Sandøe agreed that having the hens in any sort of cage is not ideal, but that more needs to be invested in finding a way to reduce the mortality rate among free range and organic hens before doing away with cages completely.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”