122

News

Researcher denied Danish residency because of hidden clause

Lucie Rychla
July 22nd, 2016


This article is more than 8 years old.

According to immigration services, he was away from Denmark when his application was being processed

Bangladeshi citizen Tariqul Islam Shajib was denied permanent residency in Denmark, although he seemingly fulfilled all requirements.

Shajib moved to Denmark in 2009 to study agro-environmental management at Aarhus University and currently works as a PhD employee at the Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences at the University of Copenhagen.

“I applied for permanent residency in September 2014, after residing [in Denmark] five years,” Shajib told the Copenhagen Post.

“As part of my PhD research I went to China in 2015, and before I left Denmark I got a letter of dispensation [valid] until 1 February 2016.”

Although Shajib seemingly met all the requirements stated in the immigration law, his application was rejected on the basis of the Aliens Consolidation Act 11, 3 that requires citizens to be present in Denmark during the application process.

READ MORE: Man tries to set fire to himself in protest over lengthy immigration procedure

It came as a surprise
The rejection came as a surprise to Shajib, who was not aware of this rule because it was not stated on the immigration service website when he was submitting his application.

“The interesting thing is that any person can be out of Denmark for maximum of two years if they are deployed by a public institution and the two years can be counted as legal residency,” Shajib noted.

Moreover, Shajib continued paying taxes to the Danish state and had an address in Denmark, even though he was working on his research project in China.

“The University of Copenhagen has made an appeal on my behalf, but the appeal board has rejected it, holding firmly to their [original] decision.”

Shajib in now planning to make an official complaint to the Danish ombudsman and is considering taking his case to a court.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”