216

News

Novo Nordisk Foundation ready to centralise diabetes treatment in Denmark

Lucie Rychla
July 21st, 2016


This article is more than 8 years old.

Doctors are concerned that the move will worsen patient care

Novo Nordisk Foundation, the majority shareholder in Novo Nordisk and Novozymes, is prepared to invest billions of kroner to help centralise diabetes treatment in Denmark.

The Foundation plans to finance the construction of highly specialised centres in each region that would carry out treatment, prevention, clinical research and education within diabetes.

More than 320,000 diabetics will be affected by the plan if it is accepted by all five regions in the country.

READ MORE: Novo Nordisk shining in the land of the rising sun

One down, four more to go
Capital Region has already approved the idea and will receive 2.8 billion kroner for a diabetes centre at Herlev Hospital as well as funds for treatment, research and education until 2029, while the region will cover the operational costs.

Central Denmark Region has approved a framework for a similar partnership, with a new diabetes centre to be built in Aarhus.

Politicians in South Denmark Region will debate the Foundation’s vision in August and North Denmark Region is expecting to receive plans for a centre in Aalborg by the end of this year.

Region Zealand has only just began a dialogue with the Foundation.

READ  MORE: Novo Nordisk Foundation giving 120 million kroner to intestinal bacteria research

Dazzled by money
Meanwhile, specialised doctors and a health economist warn that centralisation would worsen patient care.

“The billions that Novo Nordisk Foundation is offering have largely removed the discussion about the pros and cons,” Ulrich Fred Berg, a professor and chief doctor at Regional Hospital Silkeborg, told Jyllands-Posten.

Health economist Kjeld Møller Pedersen argues that the generous donations can distort Danish health system by prioritising one group of patients over another.

Jannik Hilsted, the head of Steno Grants at the Novo Nordisk Foundation, contends that the new centralised system will ensure better treatment of diabetes patients and the investments will also benefit the regional hospitals.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”