464

News

Government to curb cormorant population in Denmark

Christian Wenande
June 14th, 2016


This article is more than 8 years old.

Voracious bird wrecking havoc on the fishing industry

In order to limit  the damage that cormorants cause to the fishing industry, the government has decided to become more active in its efforts to limit the population of the aquatic bird.

The number of cormorants has risen considerably in Denmark in recent years. They are prone to devouring massive amounts of salmon and trout, easily out-competing local fisherman.

“It won’t do for the cormorant to use the Danish coasts and fjords as a lunch box,” said the environment and food minister, Espen Lunde Larsen.

“We have figures that show that a cormorant can eat half of the salmon that migrate through Ringkøbing Fjord during the spring. There is need for more active regulation to ensure the foundation for a strong fishing industry and better potential for fishing tourism along Denmark’s coasts, streams and waterways.”

READ MORE: Government splashes out for better nature

Moving inland
Previously, the cormorants have favoured coastal fishing, but in recent years the voracious birds have been spotted eating fish fingerling far up into the waterways.

The new plan, set to come into effect on July 1, means that the period for shooting cormorants will not only be extended beyond August 1-March 31, but also expanded to include the areas where the bird roosts.

Currently, there are about 31,000 cormorant pairs in Denmark.

Darting back to Jutland
In related news, Jutland has seen the return of the white-faced darter for the first time in almost 80 years.

The little dragonfly has been absent from the Jutland landscape since its last sighting in 1937, but was spotted by a local amateur biologist in Guldsted Plantage near Herning over the weekend.

In a bid to get the darter to better settle in Jutland, the nature authorities Naturstyrelsen hope to map sightings of the insect. It is forbidden to capture or kill it.

The insects prefer to hang out by smaller lakes, sun-warmed tree trunks, branches and swamp plants.

White-faced Dart (photo: Niels Peter Brøgger)

White-faced Darter (photo: Niels Peter Brøgger)


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”