135

News

Copenhagen scraps city stream plans

Christian Wenande
June 14th, 2016


This article is more than 8 years old.

Resurrecting the old stream along Åboulevard deemed to expensive

It could have been wonderful (photo: Københavns Kommune)

Plans to resurrect the old stream along Åboulevard have been given the axe by Copenhagen Municipality because it has been deemed to expensive.

Investigations into the potential cost of the project found that the price would be 10.5 billion kroner, a fee that was too tidy for the likes of Morten Kabell, the deputy mayor of technical and environmental issues.

“It’s a beautiful vision and it would be lovely to make it a reality,” Kabell told Politiken newspaper.

“But considering the financial restraints we have today, I have a difficult time envisioning that we’ll lay down a two-digit billion kroner amount on this. So we’ll have to say that it won’t happen.”

READ MORE: City Council taking new look at old stream

Better bash Bispeengbuen
A more conservative version of the project would have brought the cost down to 5.4 billion kroner, but a pre-planning look into the project by the consultancy group COWI found that it wouldn’t have much of an impact in terms of reducing car traffic entering the city.

Kabell has instead suggested that the city tear down the unsightly car overpass at Bispeengbuen and divert it into a tunnel – a plan that is expected to cost upwards of 2.6 billion kroner.

In the late 1800s, Ladegårds Å, which flows in from the north of the city, was diverted into an underground pipe, allowing for the development of the heavily travelled Åboulevard.

In 2013, the city revealed that plans were afoot to sink one of the city’s main approach roads into a tunnel and re-establish the stream that once flowed where the road now is.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”