143

News

An eventful week for Danish movies at Cannes

Gabriele Dellisanti
May 23rd, 2016


This article is more than 8 years old.

‘The Neon Demon’ stars Elle Fanning as Jesse, a mysterious 16-year-old girl (Photo: YouTube)

As the dust settles on another Cannes Film Festival, few would dispute it’s been a  successful one for Danish film following the triumph of the Adomeit Film-produced ‘Wolf and Sheep’ in the Director’s Fortnight top prize, the Art Cinema Award (see factbox).

Refn so overdrive
But stealing the headlines was enfant terrible Nicolas Winding Refn, who went into overdrive following a memorable screening of his controversial ‘The Neon Demon’ with an attack on his fellow Danish director, Lars von Trier.

The pair have history, Refn reminded the same media who had five years earlier lapped up the Dogme co-founder’s sympathy for Hitler, not least because the veteran auteur once made a pass at his wife.

“He found some other slut,” Refn told the press conference, dismissing Von Trier as “over the hill” and as someone who’s “done a lot of drugs”.

God save the king, but will he forgive?
Whether Refn had heroin addict Sid Vicious in mind when he compared himself to the Sex Pistols is anybody’s guess, but there’s no doubt the reaction to his new movie is up there with the outrage that greeted ‘God Save The Queen’ in 1977.

The reactions ranged from walkouts and yelling to a five-star review, but it’s hardly a surprise. Since the screening of ‘Drive’ in 2011, Refn’s first movie at Cannes, critics have become only too aware of the director’s tendency to provoke strong and polarised reactions.

An array of mixed reviews
A scene featuring necrophilia has been particularly divisive.

“When the film reaches its logical end point, Refn just keeps pushing, and eventually lands on a sequence so jaw-dropping – almost certainly a sly, glossy-magazine refashioning of Luis Buñuel and Salvador Dali’s groundbreaking surrealist short Un Chien Andalou – that all you can do is howl or cheer,” applauded the Daily Telegraph’s five-star review.

“The audience at Cannes weren’t sure which to go for. You might not be either.”

Indiwire gave the film a B-, emphasising that the film is “not the deepest form of exploitation cinema, but it’s reaching for something”.

Similarly, the Guardian concluded that “Nicolas Winding Refn brings the cinéma du choc to Cannes with a movie which is fantastically preposterous and objectionable, but expertly varnished with a sheen of pure evil.”


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”