1006

Opinion

21st Century Alchemy: Not all rectangles are squares
David Parkins

May 21st, 2016


This article is more than 8 years old.

Puzzles are one thing,but deciphering graffiti – forget it!

I love puzzles. They train me to think logically and predictably: to find an answer without relying on intuition, guess work or memory. And it always put a smile on my face when I solve one, even making me laugh out loud at the simplicity of the solution. Love them or hate them, logic puzzles entertain, and even challenge us, to think outside the box.

Take this one for example: “How can you throw a ball as hard as you can and still have it come back to you, even if it doesn’t bounce off anything?” (There is nothing attached to it, and no-one else catches or throws it back to you.)

Logic can be critical
But puzzles and games aside, real life can be far less entertaining, and when faced with situations that can radically transform the landscape of our professional and personal lives, logic can be critical to achieving the most desirable outcome.

And in those moments, the last thing we want to hear is a ridiculous statement like “Be reasonable” or “Let’s look at this rationally.” You ARE being rational, but the question is, “Are you being logical?”

Applying reason
On an individual level, reason (rational thinking) results from how we make sense of our knowledge base of past experiences and perceptions. We’re being rational when we’re guided by orderly or systematic thinking (reason) and not just emotion (feelings).

On the other hand, when we’re being logical, we think and make decisions based on facts and provable (i.e defendable) processes and perspectives. Maths is considered pure logic because a single, correct solution is found by following logical steps (proof).
For example, “All squares are rectangles, but not all rectangles are squares.” In every possible example, this statement is always true, logically.

Not always logical
But real life is slightly different and many of our decisions aren’t logical, even if they are rational. If you love iPhones, you’ll probably not buy an Android. Your rationale (reasoning): “I don’t care what the latest tech review says, iPhones are better.” In short, you can be rational (reasonable) but not logical, but you can’t be logical without being rational.

The same can be said about our career decisions: we’re often rational, but not logical and for a good reason – there’s rarely a single solution or ‘right’ answer, at least not in the long-term. We might think that something is the ‘best’ solution or decision, but it’s usually based more on a feeling than on the facts.

Nevertheless, we can and probably still use a little logic to eliminate ‘noise’ (e.g uncertainty, doubts and fears) and minimise indecision by limiting our choices to options we like, are willing to do, and that will most likely produce our desired outcomes.

By no means final
In closing, remember, not ALL rectangles are squares, even though all squares are rectangles. Put another way, your career determines your job, but your job does not determine your career logically. You might make some poor decisions or mistakes along the way, you may even have regrets, but a negative outcome is by no means
final.

And sometimes, the best decisions, and the best outcomes, don’t have to be logical, just rational.


Questions & Answers

Interview Question
Skills focus: Using examples and experiences in an interview

In April, I delivered a workshop focused on learning and implementing eight distinct communication tools. One of them was called OCP, a succinct (clear, concise, and precise) method to efficiently express yourself, moving from the abstract to the concrete, from opinions, statements and facts to explanations and meanings and finishing with concrete, real-world examples that illustrate your point (use the 5 senses).

Think stoplight! RED: This is what I say. YELLOW: This is what it means. GREEN: This is an example. By using the OCP, you demonstrate that you’ve heard, understood, and answered the question, driving it home with realistic and relatable contextualisation. And the more concrete and meaningful your example, the easier it is for them to connect with what you’re saying.

Workplace Question
I started a new job in January and everything’s great with one exception: the department manager is incredibly negative, constantly picking staff and our work apart, even when we do exactly what he wants. It’s contagious and everyone’s morale is in the dumps, with everyone just going through the motions

It sounds like he’s a chronic critic, a perpetually unsatisfied perfectionist who finds flaws in everything and everyone (including themselves) as described in ‘Working for You Isn’t Working For Me: The Ultimate Guide to Managing Your Boss’ (2009). Turn it around. Since you can’t change or please him, use his criticism constructively and never take it personally, even when it’s personal. Focus on S.M.A.R.T mini-goals and tasks (keep a record), make great work connections outside your department, and find personal support outside your work.

About

David Parkins

21st Century Alchemy is a weekly Q&A column for career-minded professionals, entrepreneurs and small businesses written by David Parkins, a business (re)development specialist, company culture strategist, career coach, and IMCSA speaker (ep3.dk)


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”