88

News

DF backs hotel industry’s calls for calorie-labelling to be left off the table

Shifa Rahaman
May 6th, 2016


This article is more than 8 years old.

Health spokesperson Liselott Blixt believes that calorie-marking should not be turned into legislation

A new study by the Danish Cancer Society has found that Danes eat less food when they know exactly how many calories they are consuming, reports Politiken.

But the idea of making calorie-labelling mandatory is leaving a sour taste in some people’s mouths.

Less is better
“When consumers are presented with the calorie content, they order, on average, a meal with 80 to 100 fewer kilocalories,” Susanne Tøttenborg, a senior consultant with the Danish Cancer Society, told Politiken.

“Half of all Danes are now overweight. Just ten extra calories less a day can mean weight loss of up to half a kilo a year. Small reductions have so much power,” she added.

Societies like the Cancer Society, the Danish Diabetes Association and the Danish Consumer Council have now called for legislation that would require fast food corporations to label their products and for more guidelines to consumers.

Hard to stomach
Not everyone is on board with the proposals, however.

The association for the hotel, restaurant and tourism industry in Denmark, Horesta, has gone on record as saying it opposes the measures.

“We believe there is a lack of evidence confirming the positive health effects of such measures and therefore reject all talk of mandatory calorie-labelling,” Horesta’s executive director, Katia K Østergaard, told Politiken.

And Dansk Folkeparti’s health spokesperson, Liselott Blixt, agrees. She believes that calorie-labelling should be left up to the companies themselves.

“It’s a good idea to calorie mark what you eat [but] I’m not so sure that this is an area to be legislated on,” Metroxpress quoted her as saying.

“I believe it is something that fast food chains are supposed to do, and there are already many who do it. But perhaps [labelling] should be made more visible and this is something we need to have a dialogue with the food industry about.”


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”