267

Opinion

This Week’s Editorial: Press freedom is not self-evident
Ejvind Sandal

May 5th, 2016


This article is more than 8 years old.

A 2010 march by journalists in Mexico drew attention to the increasing violence directed towards their profession, and nothing much has changed since (photo: Knight Foundation)

May 3 was the 25th International Press Freedom Day. It was celebrated worldwide.

High freedom ranking
A recent international survey on press freedom rated Denmark at number six in front of Sweden, but after Finland and Norway. That is fine.

Constitutional protection of the freedom of the press is commonplace – in Denmark and across the world. For example, it’s in the first amendment of the US Constitution that no law should prohibit freedom of speech or of the press.

A perilous profession
However, as Press Freedom Day approached, we continue to hear horrific stories of journalists being harassed into silence as they try to report uncomfortable truths.

Verbal attacks by presidential candidates in the US, new security laws in Europe and the increased surveillance of information are some of the challenges journalists face today.

Last year was one of the worst years for press freedom. About 46 percent of the world’s population lives in areas without press freedom. The worst country of all is North Korea where tightened security and surveillance laws completely limit the space for free expression.

Declining in Europe too
Europe as a whole has endured the largest decline in press freedom in any region according to the report Freedom of the Press 2016.

This year, 16 journalists have been killed. In 2015, 70 journalists were killed and 140 imprisoned.

It is important to take a day to remember those journalists who paid with their lives, or are behind bars for their efforts to inform the public. (ES)

About

Ejvind Sandal

Copenhagen Post editor-in-chief Ejvind Sandal has never been afraid to voice his opinion. In 1997 he was fired after a ten-year stint as the chief executive of Politiken for daring to suggest the newspaper merged with Jyllands-Posten. He then joined the J-P board in 2001, finally departing in 2003, the very year it merged with Politiken. He is also a former chairman of the football club Brøndby IF (2000-05) where he memorably refused to give Michael Laudrup a new contract prior to his hasty departure. A practising lawyer until 2014, Sandal is also the former chairman of Vestas Wind Systems and Axcel Industriinvestor. He has been the owner of the Copenhagen Post since 2000.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”