139

News

New evidence suggests Vikings conquered more of England than previously believed

Lucie Rychla
April 28th, 2016


This article is more than 8 years old.

Archaeological artefacts and linguistic evidence indicate that Vikings managed to invade Wessex in southern England

At least the seagulls weren’t afraid of the Vikings, or at least according to ‘Guests from Overseas’ by Nicholas Roerich (image: Nicholas Roerich)

New sculptural, archaeological and linguistic evidence suggests the Vikings conquered much larger territories in medieval England than previously thought, according to a report by the science magazine Videnskab that is a massive spoiler for fans of the TV series ‘Vikings’.

According to Derek Gore, an archaeologist at the University of Exeter, researchers have uncovered artefacts and historic records that indicate the Vikings raided and looted as far south as Devon and Cornwall in the west of the country.

Scandinavian expansion
During the Viking Age (8th-11th century), England mostly consisted of four independent kingdoms: Wessex (south of the river Thames), Mercia, East Anglia and Northumbria.

By the end of the 9th century, Mercia, East Anglia and Northumbria had all been conquered by the Viking armies, and expansive Scandinavian settlement in eastern and northern England followed.

READ MORE: Vikings may have been to North America much earlier than believed

Proof in the relics
Only Wessex – which had conquered Dumnonia (modern day Cornwall, Devon and Somerset) in the early 9th century – remained independent, and researchers had therefore never conducted any detailed examination of the Scandinavian influence in the region.

However, recently discovered archaeological artefacts such as clothing, coins, tools and art motifs on sculptures indicate that Vikings leaders such as Sweyn Forkbeard and his son Cnut the Great raided southwest Wessex in the late 10th and early 11th centuries.

Moreover, historic records of people’s names, which can be linked to Scandinavian origins, further prove the Viking presence in the southern part of England.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”