167

News

Government splashes out for better nature

Christian Wenande
April 20th, 2016


This article is more than 8 years old.

252 individual plans unveiled to better protect Denmark’s natural habitat

Brobæk Bog and Gentofte Lake are among the 252 areas to benefit (photo: naturstyrelsen.dk)

The environment and food minister, Esben Lunde Larsen, has unveiled a new massive nature package that aims to protect Denmark’s natural habitat between 2016 and 2021.

From better conditions for endangered species to expanding natural habitats in Denmark, an estimated 1.8 billion kroner (including 1.5 billion kroner from the EU’s Rural Development Programme) has been set aside for the package, which consists of 252 individual plans.

“The first generation of nature plans has shown to be useful,” said Larsen. “The number of rare raised bogs in good condition is increasing and we care for 50 percent more nature areas that before.”

“But we can improve the care we give to our most vulnerable nature. Our plans will take a lot of effort, but they will make a considerable difference to valuable types of nature and endangered plants and animals.”

READ MORE: Denmark has less protected nature than the rest of the EU

Natura 2000 and beyond
As of today, some 60,000 hectares of nature areas, including raised bogs, fens and marches, are maintained. But the government is looking to expand that by 30,000 hectares in order to give threatened butterflies, frogs, birds and orchids better conditions to thrive.

The 252 nature plans will protect 8 percent of Danish nature – roughly the equivalent of the size of Funen and its surrounding islands. The plans will also protect 18 percent of Denmark’s most valuable sea areas, including fjords and stone and bubble reefs.

Denmark’s Natura 2000 areas – an initiative launched in 2004 so Denmark can live up to EU habitat and bird protection directives – are also being provided with continued protection. Read more about Denmark’s Natura 2000 program (in Danish).

The 252 plans are divided up into eight areas of Denmark. Click to see them all below:

Jutland North

Jutland West

Jutland East

Jutland South

Funen

Zealand North and Bornholm

Zealand South 

Marine areas


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”