650

Business & Education

Denmark’s answer to Salem took place in Ribe and involved a king

Jane Graham
April 17th, 2016


This article is more than 8 years old.

Ahead of Skt Hans Aften this weekend, Through the Looking Glass takes a look at when this country used to burn witches for real

The Skt Hans Aften tradition of burning witches does not stem from the actual executions of mainly women in the 16th and 17th centuries (photo: Jan Luyken)

Ahead of this year’s Skt Hans Aften, it is worth considering that the rag-doll Guys put on British bonfires on November 5 might be symbolic of an actual historical person, but the fire itself does not recreate a event. Effigies of Guido Fawkes are burnt because he tried to blow up the Houses of Parliament in London on 5 November 1605 – he paid for it by being, along with his co-conspirators, drawn, hung and quartered.

But in Denmark, the burning of rag-doll ‘witches’ on Skt Hans Aften on June 23 – lovingly stitched together by schools, embroidery groups and church choirs – are symbolic of actual historical events. During a period now commonly referred to as the Burning Times, between 1540 and 1693, the prosecution of women (and also men) for witchcraft peaked.

Far from the worst
Between 30,000 and 100,000 witches were killed in Old Europe – some countries killed less than ten (Portugal and Ireland), while others (Germany most particularly, followed by Switzerland and France) killed tens of thousands. In most of these countries, they tended to be hung, but in Denmark and Norway (part of Denmark until 1814), where 1,350 were killed, the preference was to burn them.

So take away the monotonous speeches of local councillors and the kids’ entertainment, and the June 23 pyres bear a striking resemblance to those used to burn hundreds of witches throughout Denmark in the 1500s and 1600s. Of course, today the witch is made of straw and rags, and the screaming you hear as she burns is the sound of her firecracker stuffing going off.

The ‘witches’ of Ribe
Denmark’s most famous ‘witch’ was Maren Spliid, the wife of a successful and wealthy tailor in the Jutland market town of Ribe. What makes her story, which seems so similar to all the other tales of witchcraft from the period, so notable is hard to pin down: perhaps it was the fact that Spliid was a well-known and respected member of her local community, and that she fought hard for her innocence, and that ultimately, her fate was decided by none other than the king.

Spliid was an independent businesswoman, and ran a successful inn in Ribe. While she could make herself unpopular with her sharp, biting tongue (a woman’s tendency to fight her battles with curses instead of steel was precarious to say the least in those days), she appeared to be generally respected by her customers. In 1637, however, Spliid was accused by one of her husband’s business rivals, Didrik the Tailor, of sorcery.

Didrik claimed he had been woken up by three witches, one of whom was Spliid, who had blown  into his mouth. The following day, after feeling sick, he vomited up an object he believed to be moving. Upon showing the object to them, several priests and the local bishop declared

this object to be of unnatural origins. The case went to trial in Ribe, but Spliid’s husband stood by her and managed to get her acquitted.

Tailor-made to burn
Didrik did not stop there, however: he found witnesses to support him and went to the king, Christian IV, who declared the case reopened. In 1640, Spliid was asked to find 15 character witnesses to swear her free of the charges, which she could not do, and she was thus found guilty. A higher court, however, acquitted her of all the charges.

The matter was then brought before the highest court in the land – one presided over by King Christian IV himself. Spliid was taken to the Blue Tower in Copenhagen Castle, where she was tortured for days prior to her trial – a procedure common in witchcraft trials, though prohibited by a Danish statute from 1547. Spliid eventually buckled and admitted her guilt, naming six women as part of her ‘coven’, after which she was pronounced guilty and transported back to Ribe to be publicly executed.

It is reputed that so many people turned up to see Spliid’s execution that the priest could barely make it through the crowd that had gathered on Galgebakken hill. After being given half a pitcher of mead to steady her nerves, Spliid was tied to a ladder and thrown into the fire.

From 1572 to 1652, there were 22 witch trials in Ribe. Of these, eleven were found guilty and burnt: the first, Johanne Christensdatter Rygge, was executed in 1572; the last, Anna Bruds, was burnt in 1652.

Witchhunter king
Almost all the trials took place while Christian IV was king of Denmark and Norway. During his reign, a law was passed that determined the practice of sorcery or witchcraft to be a crime, but with his death, the hysteria surrounding witchcraft faded away.

The last woman to be executed for witchcraft in Denmark was Anne Palle in 1693: after a week’s imprisonment in Nykøbing castle, she was spared the fate of burning to death and instead beheaded and tossed into a fire.

Was religion to blame, or men?
Carl Dreyer’s 1943 film ‘Vredens Dag’ (‘Day of Wrath’) paints a fairly accurate picture of how witches were executed in the 1600s. It was itself an adaptation of Norwegian playwright Hans Wiers-Jenssen’s 1909 drama ‘Anne Pedersdotter’, the story of a witch’s trial, which has an air of sexual intrigue and covert affairs.

However, the sexual content of the play, and other literature on the subject, might be a little misleading as it gives credence to a school of thought first aired in the late 19th century that many of the witches burnt during this period, and in the centuries before, were women who had disagreements with powerful men – for example, either as a midwife and practitioner of alternative medicine, or simply turning down their sexual advances. In Ken Follett’s ‘The Pillars of the Earth’, for example, it is a reoccurring theme.

Championed by the recent neo pagan revival, which is 200,000 strong in the US alone, this theory puts the death toll of the patriarchal-driven European gynocide at nine million. But archival evidence refutes these claims – both the numbers of women killed and the nature of most cases.

Citing the archival evidence, most modern historians today tend to concur that the vast majority of women killed were victims of the Catholic Church’s will to impose their religious orthodoxies. And besides, at least 20 percent of all the witches burnt during the Burning Times were men.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”