103

News

Infamous ‘Spitting Man’ agrees to pay fine for racist behaviour

Shifa Rahaman
April 7th, 2016


This article is more than 8 years old.

He was charged under section 266b of the Penal Code, which criminalises racist speech

The 58-year-old Danish man, who last September became infamous as ‘The Spitting Man’ after a picture of him spitting on and hurling racist abuse at refugees went viral, has agreed to pay a large fine for his racist behaviour.

Price to pay
TV2 reports that the man has now agreed to pay a fine of 5,000 kroner.

“He has informed me that he will pay the fine,” prosecutor Jeanette Wincentz Andersen told TV2.

The man has maintained throughout that he was only looking down at the refugees, and Andersen declined to unequivocally confirm whether or not he had admitted that his behaviour was racist.

“I do not know – but if he had pleaded not guilty, then we would have ended up in court. It was up to him to decide whether to go to court or pay a fine. Since he’s accepted the fine, it implies that he has in fact pleaded guilty,” she said.

The man was charged last October  – both of violating section 266b of the Penal Code relating to racism, and also with violence. However, the violence charge was later dropped.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”