122

News

New Danish ‘super hospital’ has more money for art than beds

TheCopenhagenPost
March 22nd, 2016


This article is more than 8 years old.

Questions arise over priorities during hospital construction

“We’re a little short on space, but did you see that painting of Elvis on black velvet in the hallway?” (photo: Jacob Windham)

Too much art and not enough medicine seems to be the issue creating debate during the construction of a new hospital in Hillerød.

The hospital is part of the Capital Region, where over 100 million kroner is set aside for art and aesthetics in the buildings. The new hospital is scheduled to receive 38 million kroner of that to create a pleasant hospital experience.

Beds or bas relief?
Local politicians are questioning the wisdom of allocating that sum for artistic improvements when they are already facing a budget-driven decision to cut nearly 100 beds from the 662 planned for the new hospital.

“It is important that there is something pleasant to look at while one is hospitalised, but when the once the choice is been between an operating theatre and art, art loses,” Capital Region’s chairman Bent Hansen told Jyllands Posten.

Money for art’s sake
Unlike government building projects, which are required to allocate 1.5 percent of labor costs to artistic improvements fro a project, the regions can choose how much they want to spend on art for the new super hospitals.

Dansk Folkeparti health spokesperson Liselott Blixt said that she did not believe that public funds should be spent on art when budgets are already, and that hospitals should instead seek outside funding or get artists to exhibit.

READ MORE: Construction of new super-hospitals delayed

Blixt’s counterpart Flemming Møller Mortensen, health spokesman for Socialdemokraterne, said that art is an important part of hospital construction.

“I understand that it is a difficult dilemma,” he said. “However, I hope that if art must be cut from budgets during construction, it can be added back in later on.”


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”