137

News

Denmark ‘ruins’ deal that protects endangered marine species

Lucie Rychla
March 16th, 2016


This article is more than 9 years old.

Environmentalists are outraged

Some 69 species feature on the Danish red list of endangered animals (photo: Pixabay)

Denmark has been accused of thwarting an intergovernmental deal that is supposed to protect the marine environment of the Baltic Sea and Kattegat, reports Ingeniøren.

According to criticism from several environmental organisations, Denmark has made “drastic” changes to a document about the conservation of endangered species that was prepared by 88 experts from the so-called HELCOM countries.

READ MORE: Denmark has less protected nature than the rest of the EU

Last-minute changes
Last week, HELCOM delegates from nine Baltic coastal states (Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Russia and Sweden) and the EU adopted the Recommendation on Sustainable Aquaculture as well as the Recommendation on Conservation of Baltic Sea species categorised as threatened.

Hanna Paulomäki, a project manager at the Finnish environmental organisation Oceana, complains that Denmark made significant changes to the deal despite not participating in the three years of negotiations.

“For years, Denmark stayed completely away from the co-operation. They didn’t send experts and they didn’t participate in meetings until last year, when – as the only country  they got it all postponed, and now Denmark has succeeded in drastically watering down the whole text,Paulomaki, who took part in several HELCOM meetings, told Ingeniøren.

READ MORE: Climate change bringing new insects to Denmark

Weak agreement
In the original text of the agreement, countries committed themselves to drawing up action plans that would improve the conditions of the endangered species and upgrade the status of the marine environment by 2021.

Meanwhile, the final text states that countries can only consider’ the above.

“It is sad that Denmark has managed to dilute the text so much,” Mette Blæsbjerg, a marine and fisheries policy officer at WWF, told Ingeniøren.

The final agreement is far weaker than the first version, and it was at a late point that Denmark suddenly chose to interfere in the discussions.

In 2013, Denmark presented a red list of threatened animals that features 69 species and three that have already died out: Atlantic sturgeon, the almindelige skade and gull-billed tern.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”