286

News

Taxing wood-burning stoves could save lives and money

TheCopenhagenPost
March 1st, 2016


This article is more than 8 years old.

Environmental experts say pollutants from stoves are both costly and dangerous

Pretty, warm, expensive and dangerous (photo: takeapic)

A tax on wood-burning stoves could save 300 lives a year and save society nearly 6 billion kroner annually in environmental costs, according to research by the environmental economic council Miljøøkonomiske Råd.

Measuring stove use would be done by installing a gauge in the chimney that would measure the number of hours the stove was in use.

READ MORE: Old stoves emit 80 percent of dangerous particles

“The tax would be levied via a scale based on the age of the stove and the population density in the area the stove is located,” environmental economist Lars Gårn Hansen told DR Nyheder.

“Older stoves and stoves in highly populated areas would cost more.”

The high cost of burning
Dangerous particles generated by wood-burning stoves in Denmark account for a significant portion of the costs due to air pollution.

‘Individual residential heating’ – usually stoves – costs the country 5.7 billion kroner annually, according to a 2016 study by the Danish Centre for Environment and Energy (DCE) at Aarhus University.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”