133

Opinion

Mind over Managing: Automatic for the people
Daniel K Reece

February 28th, 2016


This article is more than 8 years old.

A brave new world of robotics beckons

The annual World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos took place in January against a background of increasing global economic inequality and political instability, yet these were not the core themes for the week. Instead, they were developments in genetics, artificial intelligence and robotics.

Better drivers and killers
The WEF predicts that more than 5 million individuals will lose their jobs by 2020 as part of the ‘fourth industrial revolution’. With so many production lines already fully mechanised, it is predicted that traditional white collar workers will be affected the most, with about 4.8 million jobs in administration and clerical roles alone being lost to robots.

The WEF also discussed the increased use of robots in military conflicts – one of the main arguments in favour of this is that robots will make better ethical choices than humans.

Similarly, Google this week received confirmation from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration that its driverless software system could be classified as a ‘driver’ in terms of complying with national road safety standards. Again, the expectation is that the robotic cars will be safer than those driven by humans.

Passionless, passive, past it
A safer and more efficient world sounds like a worthy goal to strive for, but surely also begs the question of where we see our part in the future of the planet.

Do we want to retain our control over our own destinies, or end up like the humans in the Disney classic ‘Wall-E’ as passive, overweight, entertainment receptacles carted round in robotic floating wheelchairs?

The answer to this may lie in us looking to define exactly what we want from life as homo sapiens. Over the 70,000 years since our distant ancestors wandered out of Africa we seem to have come no closer to an idea of what we want from life – essentially what makes us happy.

An impossible quest
Maybe this is something that is impossible to quantify. Or maybe not. I once read a quote from Mike Scott, the swaggering ringleader of the Waterboys, which has stayed with me: “All that we want is to love and be loved, to feel useful and be valued.”

We need to be extremely careful that our propulsion into an ever-mechanised world does not result in the opposite.

About

Daniel K Reece

Daniel is the managing director of Nordeq Management (nordeqmanagement.com), managing cross-border investment projects with a focus on international corporate and tax law issues. Educated as a lawyer, Daniel is passionate about mindfulness as a means of personal transformation, and he holds workshops and runs one-on-one mentoring programs on the subject (deepening-connection.com).


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”